Comments Thread For: Joshua-Wilder Can Happen On April 13 At Wembley, Says Hearn

[Corelone]

A quick nickel is better than a slow dime. But not for Eddie. A slow 12 mil is better than a quick 50 mil to him. A real slow 12, next year. The fish smell is turning my stomach.

[True That]

Well then let's get it done for April 13th at Wembley Stadium.

Plenty of time for build up and planning. Though Povetkin is not an easy fight for Joshua and is not a given. I have Joshua winning in that fight though.

But they definitely have to make the Joshua-Wilder fight for April.

Enough stalling and building from both sides.

[Brixxx]

Lmao Hearn needed that DAZN deal finished before he sends his cash cow to the slaughterhouse. Smart move

[wrecksracer]

April? Does that give Joshua enough time to train?

[BreakingBox]

rematch only if Joshua loses - that's A side privilege.

Klitschko had a rematch clause when he lost to Joshua, and didn't even own a belt. Why shouldn't Wilder get a rematch clause if he loses?

[Butch.McRae]

April? Makes me wonder a bit. That's a long time from September. We all know that Wilder has the highest level of testing done year round (for opponents too). Which has been confirmed by several respectable writers.

That April date is a long way off. Just saying lol

I like AJ but this move really sucks for the fans.

[Ake-Dawg]

A worst case scenario was supposedly February next year now within 2 weeks ,the fight has been put back a further 2 months till April 2019.Now you are saying you will allow Wilder to fight his mandatory? Let’s worry about our own charge. You have single handedly assassinated the character of your client. Forget this let me watch the World Cup and the football season starts soon.

( Mayweather voice) Sky sports should fire your arse , you don’t know sH#t about boxing��

Glad someone else picked up on that. When is that IBF mandatory due?

[Removed Now]

Please sign this time wilder

Don’t stall again

Second chances don’t come often

That's always been that way unless it was a bad decision like Jones -Traver 1 or a controversial stoppage like Groves - Froch 1.

[True That]

Klitschko had a rematch clause when he lost to Joshua, and didn't even own a belt. Why shouldn't Wilder get a rematch clause if he loses?

Reminds me of the Canelo-Golovkin deal.

Canelo had a rematch clause if he lost, Golovkin didn't have a rematch clause if he lost.

Lucky for us, the fight was made anyway.

I don't think these type of deals are fair, but it's typical boxing politics at its best.

[True That]

April? Makes me wonder a bit. That's a long time from September. We all know that Wilder has the highest level of testing done year round (for opponents too). Which has been confirmed by several respectable writers.

That April date is a long way off. Just saying lol

I like AJ but this move really sucks for the fans.

As long as they actually fight in April, I'm good.

I don't think I can take another failed negotiation though, Lol. If some more B.S. comes out before April and they end up fighting other opponents again, I'm done.