Comments Thread For: Wilder Erupts on Joshua: I Smell P*ssy, You Coward Ass B*tch!

[peplz]

He was told if he took the ring side commenting gig, he would be allowed to enter the ring and go face to face with AJ. After he accepted that gig, they told him he would not be allowed in the ring. Why would he continue the job if the main reason he took the job is no longer an option? This is well known already and is completely ****** that you are still bringing it up. Either way my time line didn't include anything before Hearns $12.5 million offer, so I don't care about anything before that, because it has no bearing on the negotiations that followed. The meeting that was canceled after the $50 million offer only lasted for 5 days. Wilders team provided proof of funds 5 days after the $50 million offer, and they continued to negotiate with no problems, Hearn himself confirmed as much. The fact that they were negotiating with both Povetkin and Wilder is not a surprise, the fact that AJ already signed to fight Povetkin was a surprise, especially when you consider that Hearn was telling media outlets Wilder needs to sign the contract when he had already informed Finkle that AJ was fighting Povetkin. The last four sentences of your comment is pure opinion and underscores your bias views on the situation, as such it does not deserve a rational response.

Now that I have answered your questions please answer the few (of which there are many) I have already asked, and you glossed over and didn't answer a single one. Please feel free to add facts, as I did in my original post that include an event timeline breakdown. Save me the opinion.

Why did it take Hearn and AJ 24 days to reject that $50 million offer, Even though Hearn basically signaled that they were likely to accept that offer? Why did Barry Hearn advise AJ to delay the Wilder fight? Why didn't Hearn answer Finkles E-mails? Why didn't Hearn include a date and venue on the contract he sent Wilder? Why didn't Hearn just make the corrections on the contract and send it back, instead of not responding and sending a letter stating AJ is fighting Povetkin? Why did Hearn do an interview saying Wilder needs to agree soon when he had already sent a letter to Finkle saying AJ was fighting Povetkin?

It's completely ****** for me to bring up eh..? Everything in your entire post is ******ed nonsense from an idiot who just repeats what someone else's opinion is and can't think for himself. You lack common sense that's why you side with an obvious liar in Deontay Wilder. You sound like a full pledge Pac Terd to me. I don't debate with people who talk reckless on the internet. Go somewhere and eat a bowl of **** Up.

[peplz]

As for as Showtime was concerned, the Povetkin fight wasn't a particularly big fight. A riskier fight? Sure. But it's not like Povetkin had ever been any sort of US attraction. Showtime wouldn't have paid that much more. Wasn't 5x bigger at all in their eyes.

GGG is not a PVP fighter. People don't care about watching a foreign cave man fight in the United States.


Haymon is trying to get rid of PPV. Showtime is trying to get rid of PPV. A lot of the fights HBO puts on PPV, Showtime is willing to spend the money to keep those level of fights on traditional Showtime.

The only PPV fighters in the US are GGG and Canelo and some of GGG's PPVs, Showtime would have easily spent the money necessary to keep them on premium cable. So just because Wilder isn't as big of a draw as Canelo doesn't mean he isn't still a bigger draw than 99% of fighters.

GGG is not a PVP fighter. People don't care about watching a foreign cave man fight in the United States.

[Sid-Knee]

The evidence strongly suggests you are completely wrong, so now you are suddenly 'bored' of the conversation. Convenient.

Yeah, you tell yourself that. No skin off my nose.

Now get back to pumping out propaganda because this is what you're paid to do.

[N/A]

get back to pumping out propaganda because this is what you're paid to do.

I am paid to correct misconceptions about the boxing industry.

I am not paid to focus on any particular topic and I am not told which misconceptions to correct.

AJ vs Wilder is the dominant subject on this website, so that's what I focus on.

If the dominant subject was AJ vs Fury, then I'd focus on that.

[peplz]

He was told if he took the ring side commenting gig, he would be allowed to enter the ring and go face to face with AJ. After he accepted that gig, they told him he would not be allowed in the ring. Why would he continue the job if the main reason he took the job is no longer an option? This is well known already and is completely ****** that you are still bringing it up. Either way my time line didn't include anything before Hearns $12.5 million offer, so I don't care about anything before that, because it has no bearing on the negotiations that followed. The meeting that was canceled after the $50 million offer only lasted for 5 days. Wilders team provided proof of funds 5 days after the $50 million offer, and they continued to negotiate with no problems, Hearn himself confirmed as much. The fact that they were negotiating with both Povetkin and Wilder is not a surprise, the fact that AJ already signed to fight Povetkin was a surprise, especially when you consider that Hearn was telling media outlets Wilder needs to sign the contract when he had already informed Finkle that AJ was fighting Povetkin. The last four sentences of your comment is pure opinion and underscores your bias views on the situation, as such it does not deserve a rational response.

Now that I have answered your questions please answer the few (of which there are many) I have already asked, and you glossed over and didn't answer a single one. Please feel free to add facts, as I did in my original post that include an event timeline breakdown. Save me the opinion.

Why did it take Hearn and AJ 24 days to reject that $50 million offer, Even though Hearn basically signaled that they were likely to accept that offer? Why did Barry Hearn advise AJ to delay the Wilder fight? Why didn't Hearn answer Finkles E-mails? Why didn't Hearn include a date and venue on the contract he sent Wilder? Why didn't Hearn just make the corrections on the contract and send it back, instead of not responding and sending a letter stating AJ is fighting Povetkin? Why did Hearn do an interview saying Wilder needs to agree soon when he had already sent a letter to Finkle saying AJ was fighting Povetkin?

And fück your ******ed azz timeline!

[peplz]

You have to stop assuming something is true just because Eddie said it.

If the contract didn't reflect what Eddie said on IFL, the contract is what's enforceable, not what he said on IFL.

Finkel wanted the contract clarified so that AJ would be legally bound to fighting Wilder next. Should have taken Hearn less than 24 hours to respond with that clarification instead of days of stalling.

Wilder should have accepted their terms and taken the fight. You are splitting hairs looking for the smallest of reasons to excuse Wilder for turning down the most important and most lucrative fight of his career. The dude has acted like a complete jackass the entire time; hysterionics after antics yet somehow it's someone else's fault. He has openly turned down multiple multi million dollar offers. He tried to buy the A-side position. He doesn't want to earn it in the ring. He wants to earn it on social media and boxingscene's comment boards. The offer is still on the table and he still isn't accepting it. But he is making a lot of noise on social media. It seems like that's all he ever wanted to get out of this. Manipulate the fans and gain more clout by being uncooperative as possible and then blaming Joshua and Hearn. Straight out of Bob Arum's Floyd Mayeather playbook. What's sad is that it's actually working the same way it did for Pacquiao and people like you who will exhaust every last drop of your intellect and wit to defend it (just like the Pacquiao fans that came before you) are evidence of that fact.

[N/A]

Wilder should have accepted their terms and taken the fight. You are splitting hairs looking for the smallest of reasons to excuse Wilder for turning down the most important and most lucrative fight of his career.

Lying about whether the fight is next is not splitting hairs. Wilder just wasted three months trying to negotiate a fight for THIS YEAR, only for Hearn to refuse to make the fight this year.

So no, Wilder shouldn't have accepted the terms and taken the fight because the fight wasn't being offered next. You can only ask a man to do so much. Low ball flat fee. Go to the UK. Etc. And then at the last minute slip in, oh sorry, we're actually fighting Povetkin, but if you sign now we'll fight you in 10 months.

That's crazy.

[KnickTillDeaTh]

It's completely ****** for me to bring up eh..? Everything in your entire post is ******ed nonsense from an idiot who just repeats what someone else's opinion is and can't think for himself. You lack common sense that's why you side with an obvious liar in Deontay Wilder. You sound like a full pledge Pac Terd to me. I don't debate with people who talk reckless on the internet. Go somewhere and eat a bowl of **** Up.

Every one please read the Quote above from peplz, great example of what happens when you hit a troll with FACTS, and they have no discernible facts, knowledge, or intelligence. Thanks for playing

[IMDAZED]

Lying about whether the fight is next is not splitting hairs. Wilder just wasted three months trying to negotiate a fight for THIS YEAR, only for Hearn to refuse to make the fight this year.

So no, Wilder shouldn't have accepted the terms and taken the fight because the fight wasn't being offered next. You can only ask a man to do so much. Low ball flat fee. Go to the UK. Etc. And then at the last minute slip in, oh sorry, we're actually fighting Povetkin, but if you sign now we'll fight you in 10 months.

That's crazy.

Yet so many Brit fans believe accepting is the right thing to do. Eddie Hearn is so transparent. I find it hard to believe, given the fact that they deal with him day in and day out, they can't see how slimy he's been throughout this whole ordeal.

[peplz]

Every one please read the Quote above from peplz, great example of what happens when you hit a troll with FACTS, and they have no discernible facts, knowledge, or intelligence. Thanks for playing

A perfect example of an idiot that takes a boxing debate and turns it into an insult contest. I can duel with the best of em' though. I will call an idiot an idiot. No problem.