Who Wouldve Won in Hopkins vs Tito?

[joeytrimble]

after each and everytime...you say it like hes reggie strickland man ...

[blockhead]

hopkins is far superior to tito in every aspect of the fight game. and its hopkins' intellegence that puts him far far above trinidad.

[mic573]

Anyhow Tito's name ain't even drawing numbers these days, unlike Hopkin's, that's why the cat retires each & everytime he catches a beatdown. Now Can U Dig Dat!!!!!!!!

Have you been watching boxing the last few years?

I agree that Hopkins beats Tito damn near everytime but Tito will always sell more tickets and ppvs than Hopkins can count.

[FrankJack]

Hopkins beat Tito in every way that night. Outside, against the ropes, and standing in there with him. Hopkins is just a better, smarter fighter than Tito. If they fought 5 times, Hopkins would knock Tito out 5 times. Bernard is just the wrong fighter for Tito.

[.::EnRiQuE::.]

Hopkins has a damn good chin, a damn good punch, and spectacular technique while fighting toe-to-toe. If anything I honestly believe Hopkins would've ko'd him earlier if he had.

i totally agree.i couldn't have sed it better myself

[Bozo_no no]

Remember guys, the question is if Hopkins wouldve fought the whole fight like he normaly had fought which was toe to toe in a rough in close fight then who wouldve won and how?

I don't really understand the point or motivation behind asking this question.

Bernard fought the perfect fight agaisnt Tito.

Why even ask what would have happened if he'd fought the wrong fight?