Quick Question That Bugs Me....

[minemax]

...''SPADDY OWNED MAY IN SPARRING :banana''
''AJ AND WILDER WERE SHlT IN THE AMAs ''
boggles the mind

If boxer_a owned boxer_b in sparring, how is it NOT relevant (at least to some extent)?
If boxers a & b were **** in amateurs, how is it NOT relevant (at least to some extent)?

[Johnnyrider]

Once someone destroys you in the amateurs you will be intimidated by that fighter in the pros.That's why Rock Newman would never let Bowe fight Lewis

[Elroy The Great]

If boxer_a owned boxer_b in sparring, how is it NOT relevant (at least to some extent)?
If boxers a & b were **** in amateurs, how is it NOT relevant (at least to some extent)?

you tell me ??????

did those named ever fight when it really mattered ???
did having a sad ama background ruin those named ???

[Elroy The Great]

Once someone destroys you in the amateurs you will be intimidated by that fighter in the pros.That's why Rock Newman would never let Bowe fight Lewis

[minemax]

you tell me ??????

What should I tell you? What's obvious already? Maybe you lack some reasoning/logic skills, I don't know...

did those named ever fight when it really mattered ???
did having a sad ama background ruin those named ???

It doesn't matter. If boxer_a OWNED boxer_b even in sparring, it can be used as an argument in discussions.
If a boxer had a very sad ama background it can be brought as an argument in discussions.

[Elroy The Great]

What should I tell you? What's obvious already? Maybe you lack some reasoning/logic skills, I don't know...

It doesn't matter. If boxer_a OWNED boxer_b even in sparring, it can be used as an argument in discussions.
If a boxer had a very sad ama background it can be brought as an argument in discussions.

tell me how a sparring session/amateur/olamepic fight matters in a pro fight

as for the 2nd paragraph, it does or doesnt ?!?!?! please explain it as clearly as you can. use examples how this came into play in the pros !

[BLASTER1]

...why do fight fans bring up amateur/olamepic/sparring shlt when discussing pro level fights ?!?!?

Because fans use these fights to legitimize their opinion especially when it helps their reasoning.
I say ams and sparring have no consequence to any argument in the pros.

[Elroy The Great]

Because fans use these fights to legitimize their opinion especially when it helps their reasoning.
I say ams and sparring have no consequence to any argument in the pros.

does anyone mention spadafora in relation to boxing ?!?!?!?

did aj and dw ever become champs/kings of hw even with shltty ama fights ?!?!?

[Elroy The Great]

you think some fight fans took massive shots to the head with the shlt they click enter on

''of course it matters !!!!!''

[dibzvincent143]

If they fought just a year ago in the ams would it matter in the pros? Of course.
Fans simply use them part of their basis to what could be the outcome of a pro fight. Esp if the fighter’s styles haven’t change a lot since meeting in the ams.
If they solely base on that then that’s their mistake.
Fighter’s history is important but only to an extent.