the sweet science!! Wright or Wrong.....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • R.Winky Wright
    Banned
    • Apr 2006
    • 1051
    • 32
    • 1
    • 1,276

    #1

    the sweet science!! Wright or Wrong.....

    I found this quite funny......This is all a too frustrating topic. i saw the fight over and over and i have no idea how poeple score it fot taylor. not to be insulting but you either have to be blind or you just so bias of winkys style that you just talk **** and make it up. I'm tired and fed up with all the bull ****. What ever happened to boxing being a respectable sport? What ever happened to HBO being non bias, it's discusting. either some people are on the dole or they have no ****ing clue what or how to score a boxing match! Winky deserved to win it was no wear near a close fight. by round 2 winky was landing 50% of his shots by. and the end of round 3 Manny stew said we are are down by on points not a point or a round. winky dominated till round 5 taylor won 6 to 7 his eye began to swellat the end of round 7. The comentary was ******ed watch it in round 8 theye wheer saying taylor had landed 6 to 7 unanswered shots when he threw 3. taylor got rocked in round 9. 2 more rounds for winky. i have it 6 rounds to 3 going into the 10th...... winky won round 11 even giving taylor the last 2 rounds he still lost! LOST! ok non of this bull ****, what is effective agression is when you LAND PUNCHES! I have seen it a few times and i have no idea how some of you picked taylor to win and keep talking like he did. HE LOST! and then i find this article on sweet science read it yourself this makes me sick! If you are a truthful fan about the sport you know that winky won. hands down! there was no draw! WINKY IS THE MIDDLE WEIGHT CHAMPION!!! i don't care anymore what anyone else says, people just seem to be so caught up in their own bias's.... man i just don't know how you can score it for taylor..... it makes absolutly no sense!



    "OUTHOUSE: Me, for that last line….And welcome back Lou DaBully, who after his fighter, Jermain Taylor, was lucky to get a draw that retained his middleweight title, started berating ringside press members who, in the great majority, thought Winky Wright was the clear winner of the good, but not great, scrap in Memphis last weekend. Even the promoter said Wright had his chance to win but blew it by dancing in the 12th round – which, by the way, Winky won in any case – so how could DaBully think his guy was such a clear winner?

    Let me say this. I don’t lateral race horses. (Okay, children, let me tell you another story: Way back when, before there was television or Ipods, there was a great radio sportscaster named Clem McCarthy, famous for among other things, the call on the Joe Louis-Max Schmeling rematch that included the stirring, “Schmeling is down! Schmeling is down!” One Preakness race, however, Clem lost sight of the horses as they went behind a building on the backstretch. They went behind the shed with a horse whose jockey was in yellow silks in front, and came out. Except it wasn’t the same horse. Mid-stretch, McCarthy realized his mistake and interrupted himself, “What am I saying?” to apologize and call the right horse in front. Another sportscaster, whose college football – pro football was a minor, minor, minor sport – broadcasts were replete with wrong calls, sarcastically tried to sympathize with McCarthy. This broadcaster would catch himself calling one man streaking down the field, realize he had the wrong guy, and simply “lateral” the ball to the real carrier. So McCarthy told him, “You can’t lateral race horses.”)

    Off of television, and obviously influenced by the one-sided call of Jim Lampley, I scored it a draw. It was tough for me to see how cleverly Wright was blocking and parrying; the usual between-rounds slo-mos were few as HBO concentrated on the corners. But while I thought it was a close fight and there were many close rounds, and thus a draw seemed reasonable, I must bow to my ringside colleagues, most of whom saw Wright winning by 8-4 margins (Tim Dahlberg of the Associated Press, Kevin Iole of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, even Ron Borges of the Boston Globe). Rich Hoffer of Sports Illustrated had it 10-2 in rounds for Winky, who certainly was never in any kind of trouble – despite Lampley repeatedly saying Taylor was landing the harder punches – while the champion looked in distress a few times. The only dissenters were Dandy Dan Rafael and a couple of bald New York writers, obviously impressed with Taylor’s shaved skull.

    Give Taylor credit. He has fought Bernard Hopkins twice and now Wright to very close decisions. He’s 2-0-1 in those last three fights. He could be 3-0 or 0-3. At least he’s competitive with the best. I don’t think Emanuel Steward – HBO’s house Hall of Fame trainer – made that much of a difference.

    It was not a great fight because both men staggered down the stretch. Wright should have known better to trust the judges and safely coast in the last couple of rounds. He was allowed to coast because Taylor did nothing to make him fight. How anyone can think he won the last round is beyond me. He did nothing, zilch, nada. There was one ineffective flurry.

    And I don’t want to hear any whines from Winky or Gary Shaw, another estranged promoter. Shaw did not watch Wright’s back – obviously ticked that the fighter tried to dump him. How else to explain how there was a Michigan referee (Frank Garza, who did a fine job, by the way) when Steward is from that state? Worse, how to explain Judge Chuck Giampa, who had Taylor beating Hopkins by two points being allowed to repeat that performance? Or to explain Melvina Lathan, who had Wright winning by only two points against Sam Solimon, being allowed ringside where she scored this bout a draw? And what was this fight doing in Taylor’s backyard? It demanded neutrality.

    There, of course, should be a rematch, but DaBully has a point – his guy has come off 36 stressful rounds with Hopkins and Wright and deserves a cupcake.

    Wright, who remains No. 2 on my pound-for-pound list, deserves to have de la Hoya think about him in case young Mayweather has one of those bad nights fighters frequently suffer.

    Oh, and let’s put in the OUTHOUSE the local promoters whose outrageous prices kept the arena almost half empty.

    PENTHOUSE: HBO Boxing After Dark for a doubleheader this Saturday outdoors in the Caesars Palace cauldron (temperatures may reach 112 degrees, I may not reach ringside and watch from my air-conditioned home) with two matches of undefeated kids, heavyweights Calvin Brock and Timur Ibragimov, welterweights Joel Julio and Carlos Quintana. Good, meaningful show."


    i'm done........
    Last edited by BIGPOPPAPUMP; 06-22-2006, 04:31 PM.
  • deliveryman
    Your token white guy
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 7592
    • 362
    • 178
    • 15,510

    #2
    How can you accuse anyone of being bias when your username is "R. Winky Wright"

    Get real.

    Comment

    • R.Winky Wright
      Banned
      • Apr 2006
      • 1051
      • 32
      • 1
      • 1,276

      #3
      Originally posted by deliveryman
      How can you accuse anyone of being bias when your username is "R. Winky Wright"

      Get real.
      it doens't mean that i would be bias i respect winky but if he lost i would be the first to congradualte taylor trust me! i am a fan of boxing, i just want to see a good fight. but read the article yourslef.

      Comment

      • Undefeated
        MasterMind
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2005
        • 9366
        • 392
        • 280
        • 17,529

        #4
        Guy your username is Ronald Winky Wright ofcourse you thought he won. But the fight it self was very close. It could have gone either way. If Taylor was being trained by Manny stewart for atleast a lil more time i think the outcome would be diffrent. But think about it. Taylor was dominating in the middle of the right, Reason this fight was even a draw because Taylor threw himself in the corner. Don't think that lump on his eye was from Winkys jab. You are wrong. Reason i think Winky was crying is because of the damage he took and he felt Taylors power. IMO Winky doesn't want a rematch cause he knows Taylor could beat him. Blocking or not Taylor was going threw Winkys defense and wobbled Winky. This fight was close in my eyes and to others. And to score the fight 116-112 or even 117-111 is just ****** and bias.

        Comment

        • R.Winky Wright
          Banned
          • Apr 2006
          • 1051
          • 32
          • 1
          • 1,276

          #5
          Originally posted by deliveryman
          How can you accuse anyone of being bias when your username is "R. Winky Wright"

          Get real.

          have you seen the fight ? i have it recorded

          Comment

          • PATO 1
            ...........
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2006
            • 4994
            • 674
            • 88
            • 12,088

            #6
            hey winky you get my pm

            Comment

            • R.Winky Wright
              Banned
              • Apr 2006
              • 1051
              • 32
              • 1
              • 1,276

              #7
              Originally posted by Undefeated
              Guy your username is Ronald Winky Wright ofcourse you thought he won. But the fight it self was very close. It could have gone either way. If Taylor was being trained by Manny stewart for atleast a lil more time i think the outcome would be diffrent. But think about it. Taylor was dominating in the middle of the right, Reason this fight was even a draw because Taylor threw himself in the corner. Don't think that lump on his eye was from Winkys jab. You are wrong. Reason i think Winky was crying is because of the damage he took and he felt Taylors power. IMO Winky doesn't want a rematch cause he knows Taylor could beat him. Blocking or not Taylor was going threw Winkys defense and wobbled Winky. This fight was close in my eyes and to others. And to score the fight 116-112 or even 117-111 is just ****** and bias.
              no man i would never make an issue of it, i like winky i also like kermit cintron when he lost he lost. i would never be bias. i just tell it how it is. i would never lie.....but you don't know me you justy have to go off my word. and i give you that. taylor obviouly adjust with a hall of fame trainer. i would pick taylor over wright but it's about this fight....

              Comment

              • R.Winky Wright
                Banned
                • Apr 2006
                • 1051
                • 32
                • 1
                • 1,276

                #8
                Originally posted by El Temible
                hey winky you get my pm

                what is pm?

                Comment

                • deliveryman
                  Your token white guy
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 7592
                  • 362
                  • 178
                  • 15,510

                  #9
                  Originally posted by R.Winky Wright
                  have you seen the fight ? i have it recorded
                  Yes, I've seen the fight twice now.

                  I have no invested emotional attachment or financial investment to either Wright or Taylor. I thought Taylor eek'd out the decision.

                  I scored it 6-5-1 for Taylor... 115-114.

                  Comment

                  • King Jaffe Joffer
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 2060
                    • 160
                    • 3
                    • 15,578

                    #10
                    Whoever thinks Taylor won are biased or have eye problems, or dumb or dont know how to judge fights.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP