i dunno like what are the rules of boxing and when did they change? i always though if the punch was blocked it doesn't count.... i'm wrong obviously!?!?!?!?
the sweet science!! Wright or Wrong.....
Collapse
-
-
blocked shot dont count men. if it doesnt count in the compubox why should it count in scoring the round.Originally posted by UndefeatedSee that's the thing. The judges don't get the view we have. Taylor was throwing punches... Some landed but most of them hit the gloves. So basically if you are blocking punches like winky that means you automatically win? Cause you are blocking shots? Nah man it's not like that. If punches land anywhere on the body it counts. Besides Taylor was going threw his D and wobbled Winky twice. Imagine if it was flush?! Also giving Taylor 4 rounds is just being biased. This fight was extremely close.Comment
-
Originally posted by flipbjefroxblocked shot dont count men. if it doesnt count in the compubox why should it count in scoring the round.
EXACLY!!!!!!!! why have compubox all together!?!!?! what is the point? compubox says this is how many times he was hit dunring the fight. so if one figther hit another fighter more each round they win it right. i think that's how it goes.....so winky hit taylor more often so he obviously should lose...........it's just common sense.
WTF?!!?!?!?!?Comment
-
Originally posted by flipbjefroxblocked shot dont count men. if it doesnt count in the compubox why should it count in scoring the round.
If you would have read what i posted then you would know what i mean.
Let me rephrase it...
You are going by instruments. What we see on the TV the judges don't see it as we do. Those are just accurate numbers from all punches thrown. Not all judges will see that. Taylor threw many punches.. Wether they hit his gloves or not they scoring.Comment
-
they landed the same on power shots! but winky laded 60 more alrogther ! so he should lose
! 163-226 to be precise.Comment
-
But the fact still remain that they are block shots. Whether you see it live or not. Why would you score block punches? If thats the case Sam Soliman should have won the fight with winky a while back. Theres a reason why they dont score it cuz its called ineffective aggression.Originally posted by UndefeatedIf you would have read what i posted then you would know what i mean.
Let me rephrase it...
You are going by instruments. What we see on the TV the judges don't see it as we do. Those are just accurate numbers from all punches thrown. Not all judges will see that. Taylor threw many punches.. Wether they hit his gloves or not they scoring.Comment
-
Originally posted by UndefeatedIf you would have read what i posted then you would know what i mean.
Let me rephrase it...
You are going by instruments. What we see on the TV the judges don't see it as we do. Those are just accurate numbers from all punches thrown. Not all judges will see that. Taylor threw many punches.. Wether they hit his gloves or not they scoring.
true i respect that..... but then why are they judges if they can't see the fight?........**** man this is so dumb .............. i guess i'm to nieve to understand! it just stinks that all.... but you do see my point right. tayor one a razor close decision to hopkins and it was pritty much the same fight...they gave it to taylor when he was challenger right... then low and behold another close dection and winky is the challanger and he loses..... i admit taylor is more exciting to watch. COMPUBOX IS WRONG obviously ......I just think HBO picked who they think the fans should watch, and not what was that right decision.... taylor if he doesn't get better will get ****ED UP against some one who has decent power and decent defence. He will be not forced to change or addapt and grow as a fighter becasue HBO craddled him along. it's bad for taylor and it's bad for boxing..... but i'm just a **** off that knows nothing.....Comment
-
Originally posted by flipbjefroxBut the fact still remain that they are block shots. Whether you see it live or not. Why would you score block punches? If thats the case Sam Soliman should have won the fight with winky a while back. Theres a reason why they dont score it cuz its called ineffective aggression.
TRUE sloiman threw a **** load of punched like 1200 and he didn't win!! WTF his jad connet percentage was 3 percent! do you see the contrast in scoring!!!!! honeslty EXPLAIN THAT!Comment
-
Most people judges fights with compubox doesn't really know how to score a fight, your not the only, majority of people get fooled with Compubox stats.Originally posted by R.Winky WrightEXACLY!!!!!!!! why have compubox all together!?!!?! what is the point? compubox says this is how many times he was hit dunring the fight. so if one figther hit another fighter more each round they win it right. i think that's how it goes.....so winky hit taylor more often so he obviously should lose...........it's just common sense.
WTF?!!?!?!?!?
Compubox is flawed and it's wrong 99% of the time. It should be called Humanbox, because it's controlled by humans.
Don't ever judge a fight with Humanbox.
Comment
-
Comment