what would you rather be? if you had to choose either of these, which one and why?
id rather not to be dropped, cuz everyone gets stopped sooner or later (with very few exceptions). but there are only a few fighters (real contenders/former champion) that can say that they have never tasted the canvas.
If I'm to take the question as meant, then by "stopped", I initially took it as KOed. But then I guess if you were then you'd have to be dropped as well, so...
Look, basically I'm saying this:
My boy was DROPPED, but he wasn't STOPPED... Nady had to end it for him.
Obviously i'd rather never be stopped. Your record is everything. I would rather get knocked down 500 times in a fight but still pull it off and win, rather than losing 500 fights but never hitting the canvas.
what would you rather be? if you had to choose either of these, which one and why?
id rather not to be dropped, cuz everyone gets stopped sooner or later (with very few exceptions). but there are only a few fighters (real contenders/former champion) that can say that they have never tasted the canvas.
I'd rather be stopped than dropped. Something more appealing about going out on your feet as opposed to crawling around looking for your mouthpiece.
what would you rather be? if you had to choose either of these, which one and why?
id rather not to be dropped, cuz everyone gets stopped sooner or later (with very few exceptions). but there are only a few fighters (real contenders/former champion) that can say that they have never tasted the canvas.
You didn't state whether knock down or stoppage concluded the fight. If it means the end of the fight, I'd rather be stopped.
If I'm to take the question as meant, then by "stopped", I initially took it as KOed. But then I guess if you were then you'd have to be dropped as well, so...
Look, basically I'm saying this:
My boy was DROPPED, but he wasn't STOPPED... Nady had to end it for him.
Comment