Is WBO going to strip Saunders now?

[icha]

It came to light, and everyone of his fan boys were screaming "NOT REAL".
It was enforced 3 weeks prior to the bout.

yeah, but they knew about it 2 months before, they could have had a plan b ready just in case while trying to convince nsac to allow the fight, but instead ggg screamed for a suspension without even being ready for the repercussions...

[New England]

In the light of IBF vacating the belt previously held by GGG, could WBO follow suit and vacate the WBO, held by Saunders, who has failed to defend his belt twice now.

If both became vacant, could we see a vacate fight for both of the belts between Murata and Derev? Or you think Andrade and Derev.
The highest ranked fighter for both is Jacobs, so could we expect a fight between Derev and Jacobs?

Or do you think that Saunders gets to cling to the belt despite not fighting?

the alphabets would all like to get a belt around canelo's waist, he's got the highest license fees. that's literally all they care about.


if saunders is truly in play for canelo you can expect him to have a championship belt.

[stealthradon]

the alphabets would all like to get a belt around canelo's waist, he's got the highest license fees. that's literally all they care about.


if saunders is truly in play for canelo you can expect him to have a championship belt.

So the new vacated IBF could become an option in a potential fight between BJS and Canelo?

[xhiddenx87]

Lol no dude. IBF is right in this case. GGG only needed to fight D chenko maybe agree to fight him with a side step deal or something but they chose the money path, which is ok, but the rules are the rules. Im glad that at least 1 org is following them.
Im a GGG supporter since 2012 btw

[LacedUp]

If BJS doesn't fight his mandatory he'd get stripped too.

Until that happens, he should keep his belt.

[Tony Mangtana]

It seems that the IBF enforce mandatories and vacate titles when required and remain consistent with it.