They have a 2nd day weigh in to help curb weight bullying and they strip duckers of mandatories. No regular, super, or made up belts either.
The IBF is the best belt organization
Collapse
-
-
-
I have a few queations on the abc's if someone would care to answer.
1. Given the abc's are non for profit, why do they (wbc for example) make up rules as they go in order to maximise sanctioning fees if it's non for profit?
2. Since the abc's are non for profit serving the sport as a sanctioning body, why aren't they transparent in terms of where their money goes - salaries etc?
3. What are the salaries of tbe president, chairman, treasurer etc etc of any of the abc's?
4. How does a ********ically elected president of an abc org stay at the helm for so long? They cannot get elected over and over for decades ********ically... that doesn't happen in real life.
5. Why isn't there a maximum term for the president for the abc's, such as Govt of USA?Comment
-
They are probably the best, but they need to clean up the quality of the fighters in their rankings. Some bumass fighters reach mandatory status.Comment
-
I don’t know
Yeah they follow their rules so props for that
But I think the fact they are so strict and willing to jerk around established names like Fury and Golovkin hurts them because fighters with clout would rather get ranked in different organizations and that’s why the IBF man is more often then not are 2nd tier nobodiesComment
-
Comment
-
They are the best at sticking to the rules they set out. In comparison:
- The WBO makes a living off cradling Arum's nuts
- The WBC (well, Sulaiman..) will crawl over broken glass to get a sanctioning fee, or use Canelo's baby batter as mouthwash
- The WBA spend more time representing themselves at court proceedings to clear up their disgusting mess, than they do at actual boxing fights
Whether you like them or not, the IBF is pretty black and white.
But as for the quality of the rankings...ugh.Comment


Comment