>>> Alvarez' resume is better than Lomachenko's...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingIsGreat
    The Champ
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 19470
    • 1,684
    • 2,397
    • 1,062,888

    #81
    Originally posted by Lopez_Boxing
    And it's crazy to not like either of these guys.
    Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

    Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

    Fuck your fanboyism.

    Comment

    • mcdonalds
      Undisputed Champion
      • Oct 2017
      • 3700
      • 298
      • 11
      • 106,172

      #82
      Of course Canelo's resume is better. Anyone who says otherwise is just an idiot and a lomasexual.

      I'm sick of these eastern euro wannabes, they have been super sensitive since Canelo ruined GGG.

      Comment

      • BM dnobagaV
        Școala vieții
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2015
        • 5592
        • 314
        • 488
        • 49,880

        #83
        Usyk has a better resume than both of them.

        Comment

        • Nay_Sayer
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 3837
          • 182
          • 1
          • 49,922

          #84
          Originally posted by Fabes88
          It was his second fight. What he has done since holds a lot more importance. If they were to fight now what would happen? He’s improved since then.
          Maybe - but it doesn't detract from the fact that Alvarez has the better resume...

          Comment

          • Nay_Sayer
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2011
            • 3837
            • 182
            • 1
            • 49,922

            #85
            Originally posted by BM dnobagaV
            Usyk has a better resume than both of them.
            And then you woke up...

            Comment

            • AKAcronym
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2013
              • 5538
              • 1,034
              • 0
              • 852,072

              #86
              Easy to have a good resume when you can't lose on the cards. No one denies that Canelo can fight because he clearly can. But if he was anyone else, he should have 2-3 losses instead of just to Floyd.

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43688
                • 4,652
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #87
                Originally posted by DaFan
                Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

                Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

                Fuck your fanboyism.
                thats what davis keeps saying

                Comment

                • Lopez_Boxing
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2017
                  • 4655
                  • 245
                  • 81
                  • 97,428

                  #88
                  Originally posted by DaFan
                  Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

                  Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

                  Fuck your fanboyism.
                  You're weird as shlt. I have no idea what the fck you're talking about. I just said they are both entertaining boxers. What's not to like? You're weird as shlt

                  Comment

                  • Lopez_Boxing
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2017
                    • 4655
                    • 245
                    • 81
                    • 97,428

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer

                    NICHOLAS WALTERS EXPLAINS DECISION TO QUIT AGAINST LOMACHENKO; INSISTS INACTIVITY TO BLAME
                    What? Dude quit. There are MANY boxers that came back after long lay offs that didn't Quit in the middle of the fight. He accepted the fight. He had a training camp. He quit. Not because of an injury. Really wasn't even taking a beating. He just quit because he was out matched. Loma made FOUR opponents quit in a row

                    Comment

                    • UNBIASED BOXING
                      NSB APESTA
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2015
                      • 2832
                      • 125
                      • 4
                      • 26,180

                      #90
                      Originally posted by DaFan
                      Why? Should we all think like you? Canelo and Lomachenko shouldn't be compared. It's a disgrace.

                      Canelo is a boss and his accomplishments shouldn't even be mentioned along with Lomachenko. Who is Lomachenko? The guy who lost to Salido and went life and death with Linares and Pedraza? Dam these fanboys.

                      Fuck your fanboyism.
                      You mean, how he won at least 9 rounds to Pedraza's 3, and scored two knockdowns? That's life and death?

                      Linares, the clearly bigger man who he stopped despite size advantage? I won't even start arguing about the scoring, I was there live and thought it was at best 6 - 3 (plus Linares knockdown), but what does that matter when Lomachenko stopped him in the 10th round and we didn't see the last rounds? Lomachenko was boxing very well for the first 5 rounds before Linares picked steam up in the 6th with the knockdown.


                      The guy who lost to Salido
                      You keep bringing that loss up, even though everyone and their mothers knows in a rematch who would win. Not just that, but it happened 5 years ago and he's beaten far better fighters since then.

                      I guess we should classify Canelo as a bum, since he scored a draw against Jorge Juarez who finished his career at 8-27. You know, since apparently fighters can never right their past failures.



                      Maybe while we're at it, we can discuss Gervonta Davis' illegal punch (lol, called a KO) against Francisco Fonseca?



                      Wow, Davis got a robbery win against a 2nd-rate fighter. That must mean Davis is a bum.
                      Last edited by UNBIASED BOXING; 01-23-2019, 10:32 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP