Saunder vs GGG or CANELO?

[Century Tuna]

Billy Joe Saunder is playing the field, if Canelo offers him the fight he'll go where the money is. He could possibly beat both but probably stands more chance against the G. Canelo is a better trap setter.

[turnedup]

Both men have disadvantages in size and movement to him. He can't beat Canelo on the cards so he can maybe be elusive until he tires him enough to try to crack his chin. Golovkin goes the distance but he can beat him if he's effective being mobile and walking him into his punches. Not sure Golovkin will get away with his jab to win that fight unless it's a small azz ring, he's going to have to tee off on BJS's body and slow him down to put him down if he's going to win. I'm cool with either fighter taking him on, been too long since BJS had a good opponent.

[removed]

Saunders vs GGG for all the belts. *** Canelo.

[TheBigLug]

I think he's an awful style for Canelo. We know Canelo already struggles with guys that can box and move well unless they're a guy like Khan who couldn't take a punch at lightweight. Saunders is a big strong unit at middleweight with good movement, tough and seems to have a very solid chin. Stylistically, i think he can make Canelo look very bad. Canelo would win via robbery though.

I think GGG's pressure could get to Saunders and wear him down, which is what it'll probably take to beat Saunders. I could see GGG winning a decision by putting on pressure down the stretch.