Should tournaments be mandatory once there are 4+ different world title holders?

[Dyl-G]

If you do it like the WBSS idk if thats true. Start to finish is less than a year. Half of the 8 are out in the first 8 weeks.

But yea I do agree you gotta put in the best 8 guys who want in & not 4 top 10 guys & 4 top 50 guys matched up with those top 10 guys.

Randomly it might not even be a bad idea to not schedule a tournament til like 8 of the top 12 or 15 guys are in it. With maybe 5 of those guys being top 10 guys or something like that. That would ensure its a quality tournament.

I think all you can do to determine who the best are is a consensus of all the rankings like Comosa-sp seems to do.

Great ideas, effpandas. You could get the mandos to each of the belts as the other 4 to 6 competitors and it would be a 8 to ten man tournament with all the mandos theoretically getting their shot at one of the titles regardless of which organization has them ranked as mandatory, (I.e. ibf mandatory getting a shot at the wbo) since the general public knows who should be getting title shots anyways. Kind of like a consensus ruling like youre saying.

This could possibly clear up the whole problem with mandatories having to wait years to get a title shot. Itd even give them the pathway to win more than a title but to become undisputed.