Not doing so hot on the ol' reading, are we? That says THE JUDGES IN AUS (short for Australia). NOT the Australian judges.
Did you watch that fight and see Horn winning? The ref even asked Horn's corner after the 9th or 10th if they wanted to continue at one point when Manny had a huge round prior. I'm not even a Pac fan--at all, but that fight was another bad look for boxing judging.
I'll do the due diligence here...
Here's your final punch stats:
Pacquaio:
Jabs thrown: 193 Landed: 59 (31%)
Horn:
Jabs thrown: 197 Landed 19 (10%)
Pacquiao:
Power punches thrown: 380 Landed 123 (32%)
Horn:
Power punches thrown: 428 Landed 73 (17%)
Manny landed 62 and 86 punches to the left and right sides of Horn's head respectively. Horn only 32 and 31. Manny 20 and 15 punches to the left and right sides of Horn's body respectively. Horn only 18 and 12 to Manny's.
Horn landed just 15% of his total punches and one judge had the fight 117-111 for Horn. You can explain away, but whatever you're selling, I'm not buyin'.
Your 'due diligence' relies on the people pushing buttons to do the punch stats. Punch stats which are widely ridiculed as being inaccurate.
They are generally only brought up by people with an agenda.
It just takes one of these unknown button pushes to have an off night. What qualifications do these button pushes have? What training? Are they actually humans or just monkeys?
Whereas there were eight judges who scored the fight. The consensus was the Horn won.
I'd take eight known judges over some anonymous button pushing monkey.
Originally posted by Travycat
No gift decisions from judges in Aus in this one.
If you want me to believe that you aren't implying home-cooking, then I'm not buying. I don't think a single person on the planet would.
Your 'due diligence' relies on the people pushing buttons to do the punch stats. Punch stats which are widely ridiculed as being inaccurate.
They are generally only brought up by people with an agenda.
It just takes one of these unknown button pushes to have an off night. What qualifications do these button pushes have? What training? Are they actually humans or just monkeys?
Whereas there were eight judges who scored the fight. The consensus was the Horn won.
I'd take eight known judges over some anonymous button pushing monkey.
If you want me to believe that you aren't implying home-cooking, then I'm not buying. I don't think a single person on the planet would.
Your 'due diligence' relies on the people pushing buttons to do the punch stats. Punch stats which are widely ridiculed as being inaccurate.
They are generally only brought up by people with an agenda.
It just takes one of these unknown button pushes to have an off night. What qualifications do these button pushes have? What training? Are they actually humans or just monkeys?
Whereas there were eight judges who scored the fight. The consensus was the Horn won.
I'd take eight known judges over some anonymous button pushing monkey.
If you want me to believe that you aren't implying home-cooking, then I'm not buying. I don't think a single person on the planet would.
Ok dude you're a good poster but if you're saying jeff horn somehow won that fight and it wasn't a home cooked robbery, then you're ****** as ****.
Ok dude you're a good poster but if you're saying jeff horn somehow won that fight and it wasn't a home cooked robbery, then you're ****** as ****.
How can it have been home cooking?
Not a single one of the officials was Australian. The ref, the three ringside judges - even the 5 judges on review - not a single one of them was Australian.
You can say that you think Horn lost. I don't really care. I saw it differently, but to each their own.
You can say that a promoter somewhere paid someone off. I doubt it, but it is possible. However, it won't have been anyone Australian.
But saying it was home-cooking? That doesn't even begin to make any sense. There wasn't a single Australian chef anywhere near the kitchen.
Maybe Jeff Horn on his teacher's salary was able to make some massive bribes? Maybe he offered free math's tutoring to the judge's children?
Call it a robbery if you want. Just don't call it home-cooking.
Not a single one of the officials was Australian. The ref, the three ringside judges - even the 5 judges on review - not a single one of them was Australian.
You can say that you think Horn lost. I don't really care. I saw it differently, but to each their own.
You can say that a promoter somewhere paid someone off. I doubt it, but it is possible. However, it won't have been anyone Australian.
But saying it was home-cooking? That doesn't even begin to make any sense. There wasn't a single Australian chef anywhere near the kitchen.
Maybe Jeff Horn on his teacher's salary was able to make some massive bribes? Maybe he offered free math's tutoring to the judge's children?
Call it a robbery if you want. Just don't call it home-cooking.
Do i have to respond to this? I feel like i'm talking to someone who didn't watch the fight. Did you not see the ****ing scores? A UD against pac who clearly outlanded horn who fouled more than a WWF villain, for which he didn't by the way get a single warning from the ref.
Horn fouled more than he landed clean shots ffs.
If you're saying that if this fight was in vegas and the ref would have given horn no warnings AND he would have gotten a UD, then my dude either you are blind or a complete moron.
Edit: and to respond to your comment about jeff horn's teacher salary, Jeff horn isnt the teacher's champipn of the world, he's the australian champion of the world, and it's australia that wants to keep the belt in australia
Comment