Comments Thread For: Hearn: One Thing is Certain - Joshua Wants Wilder Next!

[Jkp]

You better be a nerd scientist and just happened to stumble upon this forum because if you divulge to me you are a wilder fan yet have the nerve to call someone naive when you have spent the last 2 years being a spy for Wilder. Your association and predilection with Wilderhas led you to assassinate the integrity that is Anthony Joshua. I don’t know how long your nasal has been up Deontay’s arse but arse cheek fumes is not conducive with an active brain. You are even trying to articulate and justify your findings. Talking about Joshua is on Gear���� when you have been told to grow a tom selleck magnum moustache so it adds to your partners sensation. Keep that panded yam nose at affairs that don’t concern you. I mean that with the greatest of respect off course

Not a wilder fan, just dont like drug cheats.

Unfortunately the best resourced guys will never get caught. Have a read of lance armstrongs book, he cheated his whole career and never got caught.

[ChrisCook]

I am quite familiar with the Lance Armstong story and to say that he went his whole career without being caught isn't actually right. He did get caught on different occasions but was able to cover it up by the influence (by way of bribes and the like) that he was able to exert over the UCI, etc. Anyway we digress.. it is true that the boxers with the best resources have a better chance of evading the authorities but to assume their guilt based on your opinion of what you think you know and what his parents look like in their 60's is pretty desperate. I don't claim to know everything but would assume that given the fact that AJ is such a well known sportsman that he would be the focus of a fair amount of attention and testing, in fact having just done a quick internet search there is certainly info. to back that up.
The fact is, I/we wouldn't really know if AJ is juicing or not, just as we don't know whether Wilder is for that matter but to claim they he is no fact or proof at all is very cynical... do we just assume the worst in all boxers based on your assessment?

[Jkp]

I am quite familiar with the Lance Armstong story and to say that he went his whole career without being caught isn't actually right. He did get caught on different occasions but was able to cover it up by the influence (by way of bribes and the like) that he was able to exert over the UCI, etc. Anyway we digress.. it is true that the boxers with the best resources have a better chance of evading the authorities but to assume their guilt based on your opinion of what you think you know and what his parents look like in their 60's is pretty desperate. I don't claim to know everything but would assume that given the fact that AJ is such a well known sportsman that he would be the focus of a fair amount of attention and testing, in fact having just done a quick internet search there is certainly info. to back that up.
The fact is, I/we wouldn't really know if AJ is juicing or not, just as we don't know whether Wilder is for that matter but to claim they he is no fact or proof at all is very cynical... do we just assume the worst in all boxers based on your assessment?

Where theres smoke there's fire. All the top guys know he's dirty. Wilder and parker have said he is dirty so have heap of others.

[sicko]

Good Interview with Stephen A Smith but AJ was basically answering questions without really giving much of an Answer.