After Re watching Stevenson Jack, I change my mind

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THEFRESHBRAWLER
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jul 2013
    • 9408
    • 372
    • 230
    • 124,804

    #31
    Originally posted by Red Skull
    Implying compubox is a reliable source to validate your weak argument, its like linking my Vice and Buzzfeed articles to prove Trump had collusion with Russia
    Here look a picture of stats that are false
    Okay bro, you won this debate


    I'm done for today, wow some people are truly clueless least your ******ity made me laugh
    Exactly! Bow down! spin it however you want to casual

    Comment

    • M Bison
      Perfect, but you're not
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2012
      • 15677
      • 600
      • 798
      • 32,424

      #32
      Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER
      Exactly! Bow down! spin it however you want to casual
      Just scored that round with the accurate compubox tactic, I seen that you missed 100 shots and landed 0, whereas I only threw once and knocked you over with it.

      It was a good effort though, try better next time buddy.
      [IMG]https://media1.*****.com/media/xT9IgmYU3ZVaCjGafm/*****.gif[/IMG]

      Comment

      • paulf
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 23749
        • 3,340
        • 2,100
        • 1,052,140

        #33
        Yeah, the commentators were really spot on fight night in that Stevenson won most of his rounds by throwing more punches the first six rounds, at times outboxing Jack beautifully, but Jack won his rounds BIG by beating the **** out of Stevenson.

        But as Steve Weisfeld said, a rounds a round (in terms of winning it). So, to me, the fight REALLY felt like draw, but was a Stevenson win by a point or two to be fair.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP