hatton vs calzaghe

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DIB42
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 2426
    • 88
    • 245
    • 9,003

    #11
    I liked hatton if i wanted to watch some in fighting... liked calzaghe if i wanted to watch a top level guy miss a whole bunch against someone everyone thought was overratted..

    Comment

    • EnglishOxide
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 2351
      • 175
      • 77
      • 42,307

      #12
      Originally posted by boliodogs
      Joe, by far. I didn't like Hatton's wrestling mauling, illegal holding and hitting style that English referees let him use. Joe won fights with hand speed, good boxing and a high punch output per round.

      Early Hatton didn't fight like that. He was English Gatti.

      Comment

      • HeadBodyBodyBody
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2013
        • 2183
        • 214
        • 424
        • 290,342

        #13
        Joe, as he was more consistent. Hatton was temperamental, I think

        Comment

        • Tony Trick-Pony
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 16950
          • 1,408
          • 3,121
          • 139,355

          #14
          Joe Calzaghe for sure. Both could be fun but Joe was always more fun to watch for me.

          Comment

          • Vinnykin
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2016
            • 5150
            • 200
            • 118
            • 78,217

            #15
            I loved the way Calzaghe buzzed around guys just punching non-stop, like an annoying fly! It was amusing because you often seen the other guy get frustrated, and I enjoy the boxers that move around more than the power punchers and brawlers like Hatton.

            Subjective- Calzaghe.

            Comment

            • -Antonio-
              -Antonio-
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2005
              • 24259
              • 629
              • 163
              • 38,153

              #16
              I loved when Hatton threw combinations inside and pivoted his body to the side to land body punches. But the guy held so ****ing much later in his career that his fights would become unbearable to watch. Eventhough Calzaghe slapped he still had flair and athleticism that was a joy to watch in every fight except the infamous Hopkins one. So I choose him.

              Comment

              • sunny31
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 5780
                • 450
                • 35
                • 128,703

                #17
                Hatton was better to watch as he was going through the levels, up to fringe/gatekeeper level. After that the punch power, skill level and durability of opponents stepped up and he was not able to do the same things consistently. There was not the same creativity and variety in his attacking work because he was not allowed to do it. To a lesser extent, is what is happening to GGG now, although GGG is a far superior fighter to Hatton.

                Calzaghe if anything, started to shine even more once he stepped up in level. There were some bad fights with him too, but some great ones also, Kessler was a skilled chess match, which was high contact, my fav type of fight. Calzaghe elevated after 6 rounds and Kessler couldn't stay with him.

                Overall I would say Joe.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP