Lomachenko p4p #2

[Mrsantiago]

GGG should not be #1 IMO

Thats a fact!!

[Larry the boss]

Loma should be p4p#1

[_Maxi]

Canelo #4 LMAO. For beating who?

[allanperlee]

Yep a failed drug test is supposed to take you off right?

I Hope só! Also his lineal title should be removed.

[bojangles1987]

How in the world can you rank Golovkin above Crawford or Loma. I just don't get it. He's a great fighter but he's not dominating recently like those two are.

[Diego Rodriguez]

The problem with P4P is that it becomes static. It isn't fluid as it should be, it is based mostly on past history vs. where a guy is currently. Guys holding the top spot when in reality they aren't the best P4P fighter in the game. The P4P thing itself has got kind of ridiculous.

[Leonis]

Canelo should be above Crawford.

[Leonis]

How in the world can you rank Golovkin above Crawford or Loma. I just don't get it. He's a great fighter but he's not dominating recently like those two are.

Crawford has the weakest resume in this list what are you talking about

[_original_]

Trying to position GGG at #1 for when Canelo returns and batters him.

[Prince Madison]

as much as i like golovkin you cant make an objective arguement to have him about lomachenko pound for pound.