Mayweather vs Lomachenko Prime for Prime?

[Johnwoo8686]

My question to the forum is who would win between Mayweather and Lomachenko if they fought around their primes at 135 pounds?

I see a lot of people online making comparisons between these two. Some people say Floyd would win and is the superior fighter because he was the more accomplished pro at 30 years, which is true, while others say Lomachenko would win because he was the better amateur, which is also true.

Floyd at 30 was an Olympic bronze medalist, 37-0 as a professional, with 5 world titles in 5 weight classes.
He stands at 5'8 with a 72 inch reach and statistically has the greatest plus minus ratio in compubox history.

Vasyl at 30 years old is a two time Olympic gold medalist, has 11 wins and 1 loss as a pro, with 3 world titles in 3 weight classes. He stands at 5'7 with a 65 and half inch reach and statistically has the second highest plus minus ratio in compubox history (one place after Floyd)

Who wins?

[b00g13man]

Delete the thread and make it again with a public poll.

[Citizen Koba]

Delete the thread and make it again with a poll public.

Why would he wanna do that? I mean I ain't voting anyway cos I just have no idea who would win H2H, but what does it matter if the voting's public or private?

[W1LL]

Let's just say, Floyd is lucky Lomachenko didn't come along 10 years earlier.

[minemax]

Floyd has 6,5" reach advantage over Loma. That's huge...

But then again, Nicholas Walters' reach is 73"...
This is crazy...

[b00g13man]

Why would he wanna do that? I mean I ain't voting anyway cos I just have no idea who would win H2H, but what does it matter if the voting's public or private?

Posters vote differently when their usernames aren't attached to the vote. That should be obvious.

[Zaryu]

I think Floyd's style is all wrong for Lomachenko.

[Robbie Barrett]

Lomachenko struggled with Linares, Mayweather would dominate.

[Citizen Koba]

Posters vote differently when their usernames aren't attached to the vote. That should be obvious.

Well differently yes, but in which are votes likely to be more honest and reliable? Why are political elections supposedly anonymous?

[b00g13man]

Well differently yes, but in which are votes likely to be more honest and reliable? Why are political elections supposedly anonymous?

Horrible analogy. Political elections are a reflection of who you want to win, rather than who you think will win.

Why am I even engaging in this?