Lomachenko in 12 fights fought better opposition than any boxer of our era

[satiev1]

No fighter in the history of the sport has fought this type of opposition in this short amount of time and won 3 titles in only 13 fights. So when you see people making threads about mikey garcia being a 4 division champ, look at the number of fights it took him to do that. who he was fighting in his 13th fight, and who he beat. This is why many are saying he's p4p number 1. Look at mayweahter in his first 12 fights. He fought a bunch of tomato cans. Almost every fighter lomo fought was ranked in the top 10 and he beat a p4p fighter in his 11th fight.

[HanzGruber]

What’s your point? Plenty of fighters have fought better comp by the time they were 30 years old

[TonyGe]

No fighter in the history of the sport has fought this type of opposition in this short amount of time and won 3 titles in only 13 fights. So when you see people making threads about mikey garcia being a 4 division champ, look at the number of fights it took him to do that. who he was fighting in his 13th fight, and who he beat. This is why many are saying he's p4p number 1. Look at mayweahter in his first 12 fights. He fought a bunch of tomato cans. Almost every fighter lomo fought was ranked in the top 10 and he beat a p4p fighter in his 11th fight.

Henry Armstrong won three titles in the space of one year. The last two titles he won we're only 3-1/2 months apart.

[bballchump11]

Yeah and Oscar De La Hoya won a title in his 3rd weight class when he was 23 years old

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

What’s your point? Plenty of fighters have fought better comp by the time they were 30 years old

Fact, people forget how old he is.

30 years old.

Broner accomplish more 4 titles in 4 different weight classes

etc etc

and broner aint even 30 yet himself. See how stats are kinda ******, cause you can approach it from any angle you want to make whoever it is you want to look good.

[bballchump11]

Fact, people forget how old he is.

30 years old.

Broner accomplish more 4 titles in 4 different weight classes

etc etc

and they arent even 30 yet themselves. See how stats are kinda ******, cause you can approach it from any angle you want to make whoever it is you want to look good.

They act like Lomachenko is grossly inexperienced right now or that he's about to retire with more than 40 fights or something. He's not some young prospect that's about to get much better. He's probably already reached his peak.

I'm sure he'll get better wins in the future, but he's not going to become much better.

[Phenom]

Being 3 or 4 division champions don't hold much weight anymore since guys like Pacquiao bastardized the record and there being **** load of titles in every division

I mean his 1st title was a vacant belt did he really earn a shot at a vacant belt at that point in his career?

[SAINTSTEVE]

Half of Kosei Tanaka's dozen or so fights have been title fights.

[boliodogs]

Yes this is true but he was a great amateur with something like 350 fights so he was already a proven fighter with some great experience when he turned pro. Mayweather did not have Loma's huge amateur experience when he turned pro.

[R_Walken]

You can’t compare anfighter like Loma who started Pro so late compared to most other fighters

And yeah his resume is top notch since he’s been pro but He doesn’t have the best resume for fighters 30 and under just off the top of my head Canelo & Danny Garcia have better resumes