Doesnt change the fact that the hair test for clen is not reliable, if u dont believe me look it up yourself
Jesus Christ himself could tell you Canelo was innocent and you would say "well, I'm a dirty *** so it means nothing"
Yall cried for a hair test. Got it. It was negative.
Now a hair test means nothing.
Just accept Gennady LOST the 1st fight. It's OKAY. It doesn't mean Canelo is ATG/GOAT. Canelo and Gennady are both B/B- level fighters.
Fun, but far from special.
Yes but the hair test is not used as a ped test because its not reliable enough. Apparently its even less reliable on lighter hair!
According to victor conte detection of clen in lighter vs darker hair is not a problem the trouble is the levels of clen are lower with lighter hair than dark even though test subjects injested the same amounts
Jesus Christ himself could tell you Canelo was innocent and you would say "well, I'm a dirty *** so it means nothing"
Yall cried for a hair test. Got it. It was negative.
Now a hair test means nothing.
Just accept Gennady LOST the 1st fight. It's OKAY. It doesn't mean Canelo is ATG/GOAT. Canelo and Gennady are both B/B- level fighters.
Fun, but far from special.
eh ok whatever you say
I watched the fight and thought that canelo lost fairly clearly actually, he said he would meet fire with fire and did nothing like that, u are in the 10% that thinks canelo won and btw golovkin in far side of mid 30's and canelo is so called prime and possibly (probably) on peds + canelo ducked golovkin for years before that
According to victor conte detection of clen in lighter vs darker hair is not a problem the trouble is the levels of clen are lower with lighter hair than dark even though test subjects injested the same amounts
conte is one of the sleaziest people in sports, the guy is a snake. If the test is reliable then why is it not used to detect peds? Even people who like the test agree that its not a standard trustworthy test, thats what im reading
I watched the fight and thought that canelo lost fairly clearly actually, he said he would meet fire with fire and did nothing like that, u are in the 10% that thinks canelo won and btw golovkin in far side of mid 30's and canelo is so called prime and possibly (probably) on peds + canelo ducked golovkin for years before that
I agree Canelo did duck before that. Theres just no question about that.
I was very disappointed in Gennady. He was ineffective and looked his age against Canelo and landed no more than a handful of meaningful punches..and Canelo took them great.
Will never understand how anyone could say Gennady won that cleanly. Yes, his jab was better as was his work rate...but he missed more than Canelo AND landed less. So that means Canelo was more efficient, landed the better punches, and defended better...and all of that is true. That makes his aggression ineffective in my book
Canelo was clearly the smaller fighter in the fight too so Gennady absorbing punches the way he did and being unable to hurt Canelo was even less impressive for me
Why are "scientists" on here arguing that he didn't test positive on certain test. He tested positive for peds, he got a ban, he's serving that ban while not doing any drug testing. The guy tested positive, end of
Neither guy will knock the other out, a rematch would go the distance. I would predict, and I could he wrong, but Canelo would comfortably decision Golovkin in a rematch. He has more skill, just not quite as much power but decent.
Canelo has better defense and speed, but I feel like GGG's timing is just as good as Canelo's; combine that timing with GGG's better jab output and I feel like the fight goes much the same as the first time, with Canelo hesitant to throw and landing flashier (but fewer) shots while GGG outjabs him and keeps him on his back foot most the night.
Comment