Comments Thread For: Linares: Lomachenko Knows What He's in For, I'm Not Ordinary

[Mammoth]

I can make a prediction but I don't know what really will happen but I feel this is definite Linares will do well the first 3 or 4 rounds and give Loma a little trouble w/his fast hands... by then I should have him figure it out and be in control of the fight by round 7 going to a UD 12 maybe a late-round stoppage...

I'm thinking the same

[angkag]

i see... but you do realize he lost already.. did he avenge that lost?

Bernard Hopkins never avenged the loss to Clinton Mitchell in his first fight, so what's your point ?

First fight Loma didn't know how to pace himself for 12 and started out too slow. Plus Salido missing weight by a ton, plus Loma hadn't learned to complain about low blows, plus a referee who didn't seem to know they low blows were allowed.

So he's learned nothing since the fight with Salido right ? Therefore can't ever regarded as P4P top 10. ok Einstein.

[angkag]

Wow... Not sure if serious or sarcastic.

So moving up to 135 and picking Linares was an obvious cherry pick by Loma, right?

He cherry picked The Ring C, only way to duck Garcia I guess..

[Ogecca MaMa]

Seriously can't wait for your racist ass to be gone for good off this site on Sunday.

he aint going anywhere. these fa*s like him here to provoke and piss off people. never put on gloves in their lives but mastered their boxing knowledge here on BS.

[5000boxing]

Bernard Hopkins never avenged the loss to Clinton Mitchell in his first fight, so what's your point ?

First fight Loma didn't know how to pace himself for 12 and started out too slow. Plus Salido missing weight by a ton, plus Loma hadn't learned to complain about low blows, plus a referee who didn't seem to know they low blows were allowed.

So he's learned nothing since the fight with Salido right ? Therefore can't ever regarded as P4P top 10. ok Einstein.

Einstein? Einstein was a moron who stole most of his work from other great scientists.. so i get the insult. With that said.. I never said he can't be regarded as a p4p top 10.. i just said, let the man do the work first.. an let him break some champions an other p4p records before we just give him the title. Secondarily, bhop was undisputed @160.. that definitely trumps a loss to clinton Mitchell.. not to mention moving up an becoming champ at 175... at ages 47,48, 49 ..so p4p could be a lifestyle, lifetime scoring criteria.. with tons of ways to sort out who's the best. An third.. Lomachenko needs to keep climbing. My point was, he has already lost before he had ten fights.. but he's talked about like hes undefeated.. regardless of how better he's gotten, he hasn't done enough in my opinion to be considered p4p best.. but he has impressive wins over great champions.. so if he keeps cleaning house and moving up.. he will be undeniably p4p.. but I'm not going to jump the gun.. he has to do more than the greats that came before him. Terrance crawford has more of a placement than loma.. considering crawford was champ at 135, undisputed at 140.. moving up 147 first fight against a champion who beat a p4p great.. that to me, is worthy of my p4p list.

[5000boxing]

Does it matter he beat those guys on his third fight or 30th? Beating up a bunch of cab drivers for your first 30 fights gives you some special status? How about beating 396 amateurs? Do you believe there are some good fighters among them? Whatever he's doing, it's working. He's fighting this weekend at Madison Garden, making million plus, while you steam in your mothers basement.

I live in Florida on the beach fool.. we don't have basements! Secondly. . My argument was Lomachenko hasn’t done enough to be p4p number 1... in my book, crawford has done more! If you don't like that.. climb to the tallest building near you.. put your hands in your pockets... and swan dive off! Lol