Comments Thread For: Sanchez: GGG Won't Be Unified Champ; Saunders Won't Fight Him

[Street15]

I am well-aware of that.....

like I said..... IF, they REALLY want to fight Saunders, they know exactly what to do..... it is the same thing they do every time they make a fight

I asked why you were making silly excuses by insinuating that Saunders would simply (toss of your hair) price himself out lol..... based on a half-assed comment he made regarding a completely different fighter

even if that comment was 100% genuine. he was referring to Danny Jacobs..... maybe he is pricing himself out of the Jacobs fight, but that has nothing whatsoever to do with Golovkin

FACT: Saunders already agree to fight him, he OBVIOUSLY wants Canelo or Golovkin..... most likely preferably Canelo, because of the money

it just sounded like you were making silly excuses

fair enough, I will leave it

That's another misnomer. Fans can't make excuses that will affect a fight. Let's just say I was afraid that GGG would lose to Saunders. I can't make excuses for him that will matter. I'm just a fan. What I say holds no weight when it comes to how they negotiate.

But you're right though. They need to ask if he still wants $7m guaranteed purse. Hell, GGG only got $5 to fight Canelo. If they start there, we will know exactly if he's pricing himself out. If he was kidding (even though when he said it, he definitely wasn't kidding) then negotiations can move on in good faith. Hopefully that's what happens.

[TonyGe]

I negotiated for a fight recently, everything was agreed to on both side, money put paid to that. The Canelo payday prevent that fight, so i don't get this comments by sanchez, like someone else said previously, he is planting the seed in people so they don't question why GGG doesn't fight him.

Thanks for the info. I did another search and I found the article..

https://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin-vs-saunders-talks-fall-says-frank-warren--126892

They must have discussed the potential purse split. So Golovkin's promotor at least has a handle on what Saunders bottom line is. Don't know if Sanchez would be privy to that information.

[Ray*]

Thanks for the info. I did another search and I found the article..

https://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin-vs-saunders-talks-fall-says-frank-warren--126892

They must have discussed the potential purse split. So Golovkin's promotor at least has a handle on what Saunders bottom line is. Don't know if Sanchez would be privy to that information.

Maybe, but then Frank warren denied that on his tweeter feed yesterday and urge Team GGG to give him a call if they really want to make that fight. But you are right maybe this is why sanchez just came out with those comments... Thanks

[Street15]

dude..... why the fk are Team Bull**** running around talking BOLLOCKS about Saunders, when they are clearly fixated on the weak link, Murata..... ?





and YES, he IS the weak-link at 160

he is supposedly notable (but not really), and will be 100% "available" lol

they have OBVIOUSLY discussed Murata..... it is clearly not a coincidence that Golovkin/Loeffler mentioned Murata yesterday, and Sanchez mentioned him 1 day earlier

Team Pvssy

and they clearly have no intention of fighting Derevyanchenko





you guys are being played, AGAIN !!

do not attempt to talk me into going along with that bullshht, just because you don't like hearing the truth.....

and you judge a man by his actions, not by his words

1. I don't agree with everything Sanchez says.

2. It's Sanchez saying he prefers Murata over everyyybody else. Not Loeffler. Certainly not GGG. They mentioned him, yes. They've spoken ad nauseum about Saunders, Jermall, Jacobs.

3. It does appear as though they rather fight Canelo than their mandatory. Which by all accounts makes sense. If GGG and his team think it's within his best interest to go after the $$ as oppose to keeping a belt, then who are we as fans to disagree with someone's best interest. We're just fans. We aren't the fighter themselves.

4. I already saw all of these interviews. This is nothing new.

5. You said don't attempt to talk you into going along with it? Okay. I never was. Why would I care to get YOU to go along with what Sanchez says? It has no bearing on the decision making process.

6. You seem to have me confused with some yes man that will agree with everyyyything GGG does. No. I don't blindly go along with everything. I'm fair. I like boxing more than I like Golovkin. That's where some fans of boxing get things misconstrued. They become bigger fans of one person than they are of the entire boxing game. Not I.

[TonyGe]

Maybe, but then Frank warren denied that on his tweeter feed yesterday and urge Team GGG to give him a call if they really want to make that fight. But you are right maybe this is why sanchez just came out with those comments... Thanks

Personally I think Sanchez should stick to talking about training. He's made statements that should be left up to the promoter. For example in one interview he gave a list of fighters he wants Golovkin to fight next and he put them in order. Really???

[Ray*]

Personally I think Sanchez should stick to talking about training. He's made statements that should be left up to the promoter. For example in one interview he gave a list of fighters he wants Golovkin to fight next and he put them in order. Really???

I definitely agree with you here, trainers should avoid those sort of questions, Roach use to do it with Pac. Never a fan of it because your words can be use against you.

[bigdunny1]

How can you make comments like this when it's a FACT that Saunders agreed to all your terms and a deal was done. But it was GGG who backed out the agreement last summer. And you could of fought Saunders in June but chose to keep a ****** date and fight Vanes for peanuts instead. And haven't even contacted Warren to talk money or terms. Dirty Sanchez really making GGG look bad these days. They cried saying Jacobs and Canelo ran from them well have you seen Saunders fight he's a marathon runner in comparison. GGG can't cut off the ring for shyt. I think that's why Dirty Sanchez wants no part of Saunders. Either way it's just embarrassing and not a good look for GGG these comments.

[TonyGe]

I definitely agree with you here, trainers should avoid those sort of questions, Roach use to do it with Pac. Never a fan of it because your words can be use against you.

Problem is those words he uses are used against his fighter. When he first started training Golovkin he stated that G would end up being greater than Ali. OK.. whatever, Able

[aboutfkntime]

Well, that sucks.

If not, then I guess GGG should go for Canelo or DJ rematches or Jermall. The only good options really for the fans.

and yet..... Murata

[aboutfkntime]

That's another misnomer. Fans can't make excuses that will affect a fight. Let's just say I was afraid that GGG would lose to Saunders. I can't make excuses for him that will matter. I'm just a fan. What I say holds no weight when it comes to how they negotiate.

But you're right though. They need to ask if he still wants $7m guaranteed purse. Hell, GGG only got $5 to fight Canelo. If they start there, we will know exactly if he's pricing himself out. If he was kidding (even though when he said it, he definitely wasn't kidding) then negotiations can move on in good faith. Hopefully that's what happens.

then stop trying to tell me that Saunders is pricing himself out

your categorical assertion that Saunders simply must be pricing himself out..... IS ABSOLUTELY 100% a weak-knee'd excuse to justify why Team Bull**** do not pick up the phone and ask him

and no..... they do not need to ring Saunders and ask him if he still wants 7mil..... they need to enter into a standard negotiation, just like everyone else..... because, Saunders was referring to Danny Jacobs, not Golovkin

and NO, it is not reasonable to assume that just because Saunders mentioned one figure to Jacobs, then he must want more for Golovkin

it is much more likely that Saunders priced himself out with Jacobs because he wants to fight Golovkin..... Golovkin is the ONE WIN that will take him to the top, and Saunders likely thinks he earned that shot already..... ONE WIN is easier than 2, especially if you consider one of those "wins" unnecessary at this point

you - and I - have no idea..... so lets stop putting words in Saunders mouth

you know that you have no idea, and you know it will not be relevant in the grand scheme of things

btw, it does not matter..... because Team Bullshht are frantically running around talking about Murata loooool

when Golovkin completely wasted a fight date with Vanes, so that he could tie Hopkins record..... we all wondered how he was going to fight Canelo, Saunders, Derevyanchenko, and Charlo, in September..... so what did he do?..... he started talking about Murata

it is really obvious whats up man

no-hopers, to break Hopkins record.... then Canelo.... then retire

oh boy, are you gonna hear all about it if that happens lol

I NEVER forget the wallies who have completely wasted my time