When Hopkins fought Joppy, Joppy was coming off a 14 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Hakkar, Hakker was coming off a 10 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Carl Daniels, Daniels was coming off a 13 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Keith Holmes, Holmes was coming off a 12 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Echols (the first fight), Echols was coming off an 11 month lay-off.
goes to show how average they are. the weight and lay off would have nade a difference but not THAT big of a difference. unless people think if he was a bit more active and heavier, he'd have gone from getting ko'd in 2 to 'exposing' golovkin. cause people have said all 3 of the other fighters would have exposed golovkin lol
When Hopkins fought Joppy, Joppy was coming off a 14 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Hakkar, Hakker was coming off a 10 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Carl Daniels, Daniels was coming off a 13 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Keith Holmes, Holmes was coming off a 12 month lay-off.
When Hopkins fought Echols (the first fight), Echols was coming off an 11 month lay-off.
Hopkins fans are doing disservice to him. When they start ****ting on GGG using Hopkin's resume, it is no surprise that Hopkin's would also be closely scrutinized but the fact is, most boxers pull some kind of **** that can be criticized without context.
goes to show how average they are. the weight and lay off would have nade a difference but not THAT big of a difference. unless people think if he was a bit more active and heavier, he'd have gone from getting ko'd in 2 to 'exposing' golovkin. cause people have said all 3 of the other fighters would have exposed golovkin lol
Vanes is almost 6 1. I cringe when people bring up size into play here. They are almost the same size.
Comment