Dillian Whyte vs Kubrat Pulav should be finalized next week

[uppercut510]

I think you'll find it's the Americans that are biased. No matter what you have got to defend your fighters even if it means contradicting yourselves and being hypocrites.

Whyte wants to fight Wilder so what is the problem? Whyte would be the second best fighter Wilder has faced and it would be by far his biggest payday. What is there not to like? It's not like they're saying take Whyte for **** money are they?

all fans are biased to a point but do they go around acting like just because they have a good fighter nothing else matters and everyone else is a bum? some us fans are crazy I get it but the amount of filth that has been posted by UK fans over these last 2 months is unbearable. Ortiz is a bum but whyte is this monster? come on man

[Sid-Knee]

far more than wilder? Care to explain what you mean by this mate? I dont think any hw has this killer resume and aj has the best resume but not by miles as you all state.... You all act like the uk fighters have these killer resumes and have fought all elite hw opponents, how has whyte did far more than wilder???????

Whyte is more proven after this many fights than Wilder was. Hell, Whyte is more proven than Wilder was when he fought Stiverne for the first time.

[Sid-Knee]

all fans are biased to a point but do they go around acting like just because they have a good fighter nothing else matters and everyone else is a bum? some us fans are crazy I get it but the amount of filth that has been posted by UK fans over these last 2 months is unbearable. Ortiz is a bum but whyte is this monster? come on man

Show me these Brit fans who are calling Ortiz a bum? Show me them?

No, Americans are by far the most biased nation on any forum. All you have to do is read this stinking **** hole of a site to see.

Where are Brits being biased?

Nobody is being biased because we have a good fighter. But Americans are doing anything they can to smear said fighter.

Which fighters are Brits calling bums?

Show me one post where Whyte is called a monster and I will concede and leave this forum forever. You have my word.

[uppercut510]

Show me these Brit fans who are calling Ortiz a bum? Show me them?

No, Americans are by far the most biased nation on any forum. All you have to do is read this stinking **** hole of a site to see.

Where are Brits being biased?

Nobody is being biased because we have a good fighter. But Americans are doing anything they can to smear said fighter.

Which fighters are Brits calling bums?

Show me one post where Whyte is called a monster and I will concede and leave this forum forever. You have my word.

ive been arguing with them daily, im not about to sit here and go get each name and post, the majority of them say wilders win over Ortiz doesn't count because hes 52, old fat and out of shape, but will say takaam was a good win for AJ?????. I was just arguing with 2 crazy uk fans yesterday saying Ortiz is is a bum and whyte is better, I was amazed, today a guy told me whyte has done more than wilder. I just don't understand. No im not going to get the post they are on the forum bruv.

[Laligalaliga]

[QUOTE=sore_back;18735667]Maybe... I've been thinking about it and he might have a legit excuse in that by the time he becomes mandatory, Wilder - Joshua might have already happened, in which case he'd be fighting the same guy (Joshua), regardless of route.[/QUOTE

Exactly, it's a win win situation for him.

[Laligalaliga]

This place is a shithole

Hahahahahaha........ Funny you.

[Sid-Knee]

ive been arguing with them daily, im not about to sit here and go get each name and post, the majority of them say wilders win over Ortiz doesn't count because hes 52, old fat and out of shape, but will say takaam was a good win for AJ?????. I was just arguing with 2 crazy uk fans yesterday saying Ortiz is is a bum and whyte is better, I was amazed, today a guy told me whyte has done more than wilder. I just don't understand. No im not going to get the post they are on the forum bruv.

Ortiz was old and did have to take medication due to high blood pressure. However, it was a good win. But people shouldn't overlook the facts. Saying the majority don't count the Ortiz win isn't my experience on this forum. And I've read most posts on this site.

Takam was a decent win for AJ. But again, I haven't seen anyone claim it's a better win than Ortiz. He was in better shape than Ortiz and younger, but not better.

What were the names of these Brit posters that claimed Ortiz is a bum and that Whyte is better? Whyte is much fresher than Ortiz, but whether he's better remains to be seen.

That poster told you that at the same time in their careers, Whyte is more proven. Which is true. In fact, Whyte is more proven at this time than Wilder was when he fought Stiverne for the first time. You simply can't dispute that.

[Laligalaliga]

I don’t rate Brezeale but he’s on a very similar (arguably higher) level to Whyte😂😂
So if he’s a bum, what does that make Whyte?
Idiot...

You’re just another salty matchroom fanboy, with little understanding of the sport.

Welcome to the ignore list...

No body with a brain will bet breazeale to beat whyte if not for ******s like you.
Banana breazeale, pure confirmed bum.

[uppercut510]

Whyte is more proven after this many fights than Wilder was. Hell, Whyte is more proven than Wilder was when he fought Stiverne for the first time.

oh boy, u got it bro, ur right

[uppercut510]

Ortiz was old and did have to take medication due to high blood pressure. However, it was a good win. But people shouldn't overlook the facts. Saying the majority don't count the Ortiz win isn't my experience on this forum. And I've read most posts on this site.

Takam was a decent win for AJ. But again, I haven't seen anyone claim it's a better win than Ortiz. He was in better shape than Ortiz and younger, but not better.

What were the names of these Brit posters that claimed Ortiz is a bum and that Whyte is better? Whyte is much fresher than Ortiz, but whether he's better remains to be seen.

That poster told you that at the same time in their careers, Whyte is more proven. Which is true. In fact, Whyte is more proven at this time than Wilder was when he fought Stiverne for the first time. You simply can't dispute that.

your thoughts on this

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=780853