Comments Thread For: Jacobs: I Was Able To Overpower What Gennady Golovkin Did

[satiev1]

By getting dropped and outjabbed 3-1 out landed 2-1. Ummm no.

[TonyGe]

Trinidad IS a much better fighter than Jacobs, no question

it is ridiculous to suggest otherwise, you really need to get a clue

Trinidad knocked out middleweights before/after Hopkins

Jacobs has looked average in his last two outings, in fact his ONLY notable performance is a losing effort to Golovkin..... if the JMW Sulecki could land on Jacobs at will, and survive no problem..... then I would back Trinidad to catch Jacobs with a fight-changing punch (probably a hook or straight right-hand) and eventually stop him

Jacobs legacy is sooooo thin, that if he loses his next fight..... Murray or Lemieux would replace Jacobs as Golovkin's best win..... so, you are fkn DREAMING lol

not only is your your silly, flawed-logic, quadrangle-theory, completely irrelevant..... because the question is, who has the best win, not..... which fighters best win would prevail if those guys fought

so yea..... your flawed logic, is just an opinion..... an opinion that could not only EASILY be wrong, it would probably be wrong

FACT: Trinidad was great, Jacobs was not

I see you didn't acknowledge that you misquoted me. Not surprising..

[aboutfkntime]

I see you didn't acknowledge that you misquoted me. Not surprising..

why are you even discussing Trinidad vs Jacobs ?

why ?

I know why

fk off lol

stop being an excuse-making muppet, or I will put you in my sig again

[SUBZER0ED]

just a guess, could be wrong......

1) the conditions were exactly the same, so I am guessing that he weighed exactly the same..... likely little/no difference

2) piling on weight does not help bro..... could it technically give you a little extra punch resistance..... maybe..... but more likely a shot that would put you away, will put you away, regardless..... you want to be light, and sharp, to be at your best.....

3) the notion that Jacobs gave Golovkin problems because of the perception that he gained EXTRA weight being the difference between a standard weighin and the IBF same-day weighin..... is hilarious to me

* Jacobs weighed exactly the same as he always weighed
* Golovkin knocks out heavyweights in sparring, but now a couple of pounds has turned Danny Jacobs into a monster?
* many past middleweights have been bigger than Jacobs, would all of those guys also give Golovkin fits?
* what about all that talk of 168, Froch, Hopkins, Jack, Chudinov, Ramirez..... what about them?

how was he going to handle Ward, who would have monstered him?..... and is waaaaay better than Danny Jacobs?

I'm not buying your arguments, bro. Jacobs was clearly heavier against Golovkin and it was for a reason. Think about it, less drain + more size= more strength and punch resistance (as you somewhat admit) on fight night. Your hypotheticals don't fly- I'm talking about what did happen.

[aboutfkntime]

I'm not buying your arguments, bro. Jacobs was clearly heavier against Golovkin and it was for a reason. Think about it, less drain + more size= more strength and punch resistance (as you somewhat admit) on fight night. Your hypotheticals don't fly- I'm talking about what did happen.

lets agree to disagree

if a couple of pounds of rehydration weight (water) could make Jacobs invulnerable, how the fk was Golovkin going to compete with guys at 168?

how the hell was he ever going to beat Ward, who would have MONSTERED him?

I think that Jacobs was the same size he always was, he is a big middleweight

we thought that Gennady could beat big middleweights ?

[Bad_Guy]

Same reasoning is used when fans try to claim Canelo won the fight against GGG: "Golovkin was supposed to knock him out, but he didn't!!!" This is boxing, not Survivor.