Comments Thread For: Jacobs: I Was Able To Overpower What Gennady Golovkin Did

[trueblood]

Fight

FIGHT DON"T TALK....

Jacobs is still sucking GGG tit......Get a life..
You looked like poop against Suckleckey....

If he had a punch like you know who...SLEEPY TIME>

Fight Charlo or the Russian.....Charlo fight the russian..


Bunch of Debutantes ..Like this Red Headed jerk.

Buyers are A holes..

[miked85]

is jacobs or big baby star power any bigger after this fight? is he a relevant middleweight that casuals know, can he sell out? its your borough, you have matchroom, and can't sell tickets, thats crazy i thought HBO & Matchroom would help him?

[Graz]

FIGHT DON"T TALK....

Jacobs is still sucking GGG tit......Get a life..
You looked like poop against Suckleckey....

If he had a punch like you know who...SLEEPY TIME>

Fight Charlo or the Russian.....Charlo fight the russian..


Bunch of Debutantes ..Like this Red Headed jerk.

Buyers are A holes..

As you say Jacobs should fight Charlo next if possible. Both need a boost in their credibility.

[aboutfkntime]

As you say Jacobs should fight Charlo next if possible. Both need a boost in their credibility.

just a thought.....

IF Jacobs beat Charlo, he would have a better resume than Golovkin

who needs a boost to their credibility again ?

#rosecoloredglasses

[Graz]

just a thought.....

IF Jacobs beat Charlo, he would have a better resume than Golovkin

who needs a boost to their credibility again ?

#rosecoloredglasses

Another thought. If Jacobs beat Charlo it would mean that Jacobs beat Charlo. It has nothing to do with Golovkin’s resume. Golovkin already beat Jacobs.

[aboutfkntime]

Another thought. If Jacobs beat Charlo it would mean that Jacobs beat Charlo. It has nothing to do with Golovkin’s resume. Golovkin already beat Jacobs.

wtf ?

if Jacobs beat Charlo, he would likely have a better resume than Golovkin

Golovkin has Lemieux, and a * over Jacobs.....

Jacobs will have Charlo, Quillin, and a * over Golovkin

if Jacobs beat Charlo..... then Jacobs > Golovkin

put it this way.... it will be debatable, and there will be little in it

Golovkin hasn't proven shht

[TonyGe]

wtf ?

if Jacobs beat Charlo, he would likely have a better resume than Golovkin

Golovkin has Lemieux, and a * over Jacobs.....

Jacobs will have Charlo, Quillin, and a * over Golovkin

if Jacobs beat Charlo..... then Jacobs > Golovkin

put it this way.... it will be debatable, and there will be little in it

Golovkin hasn't proven shht

Man you are really getting desperate.

[aboutfkntime]

Man you are really getting desperate.

I am not the guy who resorted to.....

" Jacobs would beat Trinidad, so Golovkin is better than Hopkins "

your boy has a hollow resume, so conversations like this were always going to happen

you should have gotten tired of defending Golovkin YEARS ago lol

maybe you will pick up on the warning signs next time

[TonyGe]

I am not the guy who resorted to.....

" Jacobs would beat Trinidad, so Golovkin is better than Hopkins "

your boy has a hollow resume, so conversations like this were always going to happen

you should have gotten tired of defending Golovkin YEARS ago lol

maybe you will pick up on the warning signs next time

I have never said "Jacobs would beat Trinidad, so Golovkin is better than Hopkins" as you claim.

I did say Jacobs would beat Trinidad because people were claiming Trinidad is better than Jacobs which is ridiculous. Try and get your quotes accurate.

[aboutfkntime]

I have never said "Jacobs would beat Trinidad, so Golovkin is better than Hopkins" as you claim.

I did say Jacobs would beat Trinidad because people were claiming Trinidad is better than Jacobs which is ridiculous. Try and get your quotes accurate.

Trinidad IS a much better fighter than Jacobs, no question

it is ridiculous to suggest otherwise, you really need to get a clue

Trinidad knocked out middleweights before/after Hopkins

Jacobs has looked average in his last two outings, in fact his ONLY notable performance is a losing effort to Golovkin..... if the JMW Sulecki could land on Jacobs at will, and survive no problem..... then I would back Trinidad to catch Jacobs with a fight-changing punch (probably a hook or straight right-hand) and eventually stop him

Jacobs legacy is sooooo thin, that if he loses his next fight..... Murray or Lemieux would replace Jacobs as Golovkin's best win..... so, you are fkn DREAMING lol

not only is your your silly, flawed-logic, quadrangle-theory, completely irrelevant..... because the question is, who has the best win, not..... which fighters best win would prevail if those guys fought

so yea..... your flawed logic, is just an opinion..... an opinion that could not only EASILY be wrong, it would probably be wrong

FACT: Trinidad was great, Jacobs was not