This is long but interesting, please read...
First off all, I attended the fight and decision aside, it was a great experience I was able to share with my wife and I am honored to have been able to do it.
As you may know from another thread, I had it 116-112 for Winky on my "100% objective" card and 115-113 for Wink on my "judges influenced by crowd and think Taylor's punches are landing when they're not" card.
Now, we TIVO'd the fight on HBO and we finally got to watch it last night. One word comes to mind: sickening.
Lampley's love for all things Olympics is well-documented, but this exceeds even his "best" efforts in hyping fighters, edging out even Hopkins-Taylor I and Mosley-DLH II.
Lennox Lewis was the only one of the three consistently pointed out what Winky was doing right, jabbing effectively, controlling the pace of the bout and unexpectedly yet brilliantly taking the lead. Merchant would throw some credit Winky's way, but it was more of a "he's got guts coming forward even if it's not working too well" attitude. It was working tremendously well.
Lampley is in a league of his own. So many of the Taylor shots that were easily blocked or picked off by Winky were "BIG RIGHT HANDS", and we all know how that was in the two Hopkins fights...Taylor rarely EVER misses according to Lamps, but look at the CompuBox and there's the story. Someone on maxboxing.com (Fischer or Raskin) mentioned that it's amazing how HBO preaches CompuBox unless it tells a different story that what they are...case in point right here...
DID ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THEY STOPPED TRACKING JABS THROWN/LANDED AROUND THE 6th ROUND???? This is unbelievable!
Winky's jab was consistently the most effective punch throughout the fight, and headbutts or no that eye didn't magically close. Even in the post-fight recap, as Lampley struggled to fight through the truth that not only did Winky land a shot or two more than Taylor (even power punches), his connect rate was much, much better. THEN THEY DIDN'T SHOW THE JAB TOTALS! Has this EVER happened before? And don't say whenver it's lopsided they don't show it, they always do--Lamps will sometimes just say "jabs (que graphic), not that big a factor in the fight" or somesuch, but they do show it.
Lampley tried to discredit CompuBox by declaring Taylor landed the much harder blows...yeah, WHEN he landed. Just because Wink moved when he blocked Taylor's big shots, doesn't mean they landed. He couldn't set his feet in concrete, he's going to move; it's called physics. Taylor got a lot of credit for partially-blocked shots as well.
As for the 12th round, read my post in the other thread, Winky didn't run, he didn't give it away, and Taylor SURELY did nothing to win the round AT ALL. I want to see CompuBox numbers for the 12th.
Thoughts?
First off all, I attended the fight and decision aside, it was a great experience I was able to share with my wife and I am honored to have been able to do it.
As you may know from another thread, I had it 116-112 for Winky on my "100% objective" card and 115-113 for Wink on my "judges influenced by crowd and think Taylor's punches are landing when they're not" card.
Now, we TIVO'd the fight on HBO and we finally got to watch it last night. One word comes to mind: sickening.
Lampley's love for all things Olympics is well-documented, but this exceeds even his "best" efforts in hyping fighters, edging out even Hopkins-Taylor I and Mosley-DLH II.
Lennox Lewis was the only one of the three consistently pointed out what Winky was doing right, jabbing effectively, controlling the pace of the bout and unexpectedly yet brilliantly taking the lead. Merchant would throw some credit Winky's way, but it was more of a "he's got guts coming forward even if it's not working too well" attitude. It was working tremendously well.
Lampley is in a league of his own. So many of the Taylor shots that were easily blocked or picked off by Winky were "BIG RIGHT HANDS", and we all know how that was in the two Hopkins fights...Taylor rarely EVER misses according to Lamps, but look at the CompuBox and there's the story. Someone on maxboxing.com (Fischer or Raskin) mentioned that it's amazing how HBO preaches CompuBox unless it tells a different story that what they are...case in point right here...
DID ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THEY STOPPED TRACKING JABS THROWN/LANDED AROUND THE 6th ROUND???? This is unbelievable!
Winky's jab was consistently the most effective punch throughout the fight, and headbutts or no that eye didn't magically close. Even in the post-fight recap, as Lampley struggled to fight through the truth that not only did Winky land a shot or two more than Taylor (even power punches), his connect rate was much, much better. THEN THEY DIDN'T SHOW THE JAB TOTALS! Has this EVER happened before? And don't say whenver it's lopsided they don't show it, they always do--Lamps will sometimes just say "jabs (que graphic), not that big a factor in the fight" or somesuch, but they do show it.
Lampley tried to discredit CompuBox by declaring Taylor landed the much harder blows...yeah, WHEN he landed. Just because Wink moved when he blocked Taylor's big shots, doesn't mean they landed. He couldn't set his feet in concrete, he's going to move; it's called physics. Taylor got a lot of credit for partially-blocked shots as well.
As for the 12th round, read my post in the other thread, Winky didn't run, he didn't give it away, and Taylor SURELY did nothing to win the round AT ALL. I want to see CompuBox numbers for the 12th.
Thoughts?
Comment