Originally posted by man down
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Sanchez: Jacobs Looked Terrible, Not Same After Fighting Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Boxing1012 View PostAnd I think it's funny how Danny is only a good fighter now that he went 12 rounds with GGG. If GGG knocked him out in the 11th round no one would give GGG credit for that win and people would say Danny was a chinny bum.
Basically if GGG knocks someone out - that guy is immediately a bum. If they go 12 rounds GGG was exposed and that guy is also a top level fighter? Just weird logic honestly.
then they fight and all of the sudden danny is some A-level elite fighter...lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Butch.McRae View PostDanny has always looked the same. There's been no substantial drop off at all. Has always been the same fighter: solid power/skill, marginal footwork, unfocused/low motor for stretches of fights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Butch.McRae View Post*C level*
I fixed it for you. Most professionals now are historically C level fighters. There's not many A fighters boxing these days.
I honestly wouldn't have ran down that list lol love GGG, but come on.
Comment
-
Lmao c'mon Abel, sulecki is a good underated fighter, he dropped and tkod Hugo centeno before Charlo did , nobody gave sulecki credit for that but since Charlo did it all of a sudden he's 'the best at 160' ..not to mention that Jacobs beat golovkin in my opinion
Comment
-
Originally posted by Curt Henning View Postgolovkins own fans were discrediting danny before they even fought...they thought danny was ducking over money and said pirog killed him and even featherfisted sergio mora dropped him...they were saying he stunk when they thought jacobs was ducking
then they fight and all of the sudden danny is some A-level elite fighter...lol
And idk...I think everyone knew Danny was a really good boxer. He was just chinny - no one gave him a shot because of that. It's funny because going into all of GGG's other fights, people were always giving those guys more of a chance than Jacobs. Stevens Lemieux Monroe. I remember all of those guys being hyped up into having a shot against GGG.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing1012 View PostDanny was being shady on the money, but hey it worked for him.
And idk...I think everyone knew Danny was a really good boxer. He was just chinny - no one gave him a shot because of that. It's funny because going into all of GGG's other fights, people were always giving those guys more of a chance than Jacobs. Stevens Lemieux Monroe. I remember all of those guys being hyped up into having a shot against GGG.
Comment
-
Gimme a break. Jacobs didn’t take some life-altering beating. Many of us have seen those. In the old days, fighters would go to war and come back the following week for more. It’s almost embarrassing to read this from Sanchez.
Comment
Comment