Wilder: It's Like Buying House; Accept Price THEN Contract Follows

[Boksfan]

This isnt true .

Hearn/ Joshua WANT the fight next .

Finkel wants it at the end of this year bc he knows he can posture for more money while they pretend they HAD to fight Breazeale bc they werent going to wait .

My question is why risk getting knocked out by a 6'7 250 plus pounder instead of at least 12.5 Million dollar fight . Wilder claims he will win yet fights under 2 Million and deflects a potential 35 Million dollar Joshua double fight ? :wank:

Maybe you're right, maybe not. I'm just guessing here. After all I just want to see the fight, hope Breazeale won't kill Wilder in the summer.

[juggernaut666]

Maybe you're right, maybe not. I'm just guessing here. After all I just want to see the fight, hope Breazeale won't kill Wilder in the summer.

At this point i wouldn't mind seeing that .


Im right bc Finkel admitted to it in his letter .

Are we suppose to believe he doesnt have any fights planned from now to end of year ? That would be 5 to 8 months of what hes proposing . lol

Meanwhile WBC lets Wilder do what he wants while Joshua has 4 belts and all these potential opponents to deal with so Finkel knows this .


Which is why im going to have a field day SHOULD Wilder lose .

[STREET CLEANER]

I can see most here haven't bought a house. You agree on a price, the contract goes out and gets reviewed. Any changes will go along the way. It is not a final draft and I am sure that they will negotiate everything from the venue, gloves, pay, etc.

[Holler]

I can see most here haven't bought a house. You agree on a price, the contract goes out and gets reviewed. Any changes will go along the way. It is not a final draft and I am sure that they will negotiate everything from the venue, gloves, pay, etc.

Do you think that a house purchase is a useful analogy?

[uppercut510]

Hearn wants big baby miller in the states but wilder can only be in the uk

[uppercut510]

do you think that a house purchase is a useful analogy?

nothing team wilder says is good enough, but anything hearn says is gold, we get it

[uppercut510]

i've been around long enough to know why hearn wouldn't want to take the 50 million. I've been around long enough to know why he's making excuses and why his excuses are nonsense.

He has the biggest cash cow in boxing. It would border on malpractice for him to rush the biggest cash cow into the ring with the most dangerous puncher. Yes, 50 million is a lot of money. But if they'll pay 50 million now, they'll still pay 50 million later and it's safer to squeeze in a couple more fights first.

If i was hearn, i wouldn't take the deal. If i was hearn, i'd be making up a bunch of ridiculous excuses for why i'm not taking the deal so that aj can save face and still generate a ton of revenue in his next fight or two before possibly finally fighting wilder.

I'm not knocking anything hearn is doing, i'm just explaining why his excuses are bull****. The truth is that it would be a poor business decision for hearn to accept the 50 million. Had nothing to do with whether the offer is real. He knows it's real. It's haymon & finkel, of course the money is real.

But to go to america, to fight the most dangerous puncher in the world, with no rematch clause, is so insanely risky that it really doesn't matter what the money is. But hearn can't come out and say that. He can't go on ifl and say, "the money is huge, but wilder is too dangerous so we need to stall a little longer."

any time i've bought a house or property, until my realtor and the seller's realtor have come to an understanding on price, the other particulars haven't been worked on.

great post!!!!!!!!!!!

[Holler]

nothing team wilder says is good enough, but anything hearn says is gold, we get it

I didn't say that?

[GGG Gloveking]

Do you think that a house purchase is a useful analogy?

I think it's a perfect analogy. Your buyer is the boxer, the agent is the promotor, and the houses are potential opponents. Your agent rides you around looking at houses. When you find what you like, you agree on a price and paperwork is drawn up. Sometimes theres haggling with the seller (other boxers promotor) before a final draft is signed. But the real estate agent doesn't ride around with half a dozen contracts in his/her car just in case you might want to sign. And I've never heard of "I'll agree to the price of the house, only after I see a contract and a guarantee of ownership of the house"

So, yeah, I think it's a good analogy

[STREET CLEANER]

Do you think that a house purchase is a useful analogy?

If you like the price you accept the offer and move forward. If the contract is too biding and there is no room for negotiations you don't sign.

Yes indeed. I buy a lot of houses. We agree on the price, the contract comes my way and if I don't like the stipulations or the refuse to hammer some important details I walk away.

No use to send a contract if you don't agree on the price.