1 . Hearns simple request to sit down going over the details thinks its a step in the right direction . He has planned this meeting weeks ago and was optimistic in making a deal.
2. Finkel suggests Hearn needs to accept a money deadline in which details will not be disclosed until he does so . In the meantime hes delayed and out right cancelled any meeting .
Both sides with Hearn there now have the opportunity now to look over ANY intangables .
Is Finkel being unrealistic and purposely sabotaging the deal or is Hearn not letting the deal go forward because he wants to know what exactly the 50 Million offer entails ?
2. Finkel suggests Hearn needs to accept a money deadline in which details will not be disclosed until he does so . In the meantime hes delayed and out right cancelled any meeting .
Both sides with Hearn there now have the opportunity now to look over ANY intangables .
Is Finkel being unrealistic and purposely sabotaging the deal or is Hearn not letting the deal go forward because he wants to know what exactly the 50 Million offer entails ?

Comment