Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I think a lot of people owe Canelo an apology

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    This findings of the Reece Commitee are just the tip of the iceberg.

    You need to move on to The Naked Capitalist to see how deep the rabbit hole really goes.
    Who wrote the naked capitalist?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Gigantes View Post
      Yea where's the proof he ate a bad steak. Just a link that says he ate a bad steak.

      Why would he eat steak though with it's history? (You omitted this part of my post)
      Again, he has always said that it was from contaminated beef. Why would you need a link for that, unless the link has a video of him eating beef?

      Why would he eat a steak? Because he was hungry....?


      Maybe he trusted his chef who and thought clenbuterol would only be in lower quality beef, like I've heard many people here say would be the case.

      Again, the point that you refuse to acknowledge, is that 2 experts and now a hair test have sided with his story. They could be wrong, sure. But on the other side, there has been no solid evidence that this was from more than beef contamination.

      I'm not sure why you're so worked up about it. Let it go. He got 6 months and he'll be tested more. If you have some proof that it was from more than tainted beef, I'm sure the world would love to have it. Enlighten us!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
        Who wrote the naked capitalist?
        W. Cleon Skousen.

        FBI Special Agent, police chief and teacher at BYU.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
          Again, he has always said that it was from contaminated beef. Why would you need a link for that, unless the link has a video of him eating beef?

          Why would he eat a steak? Because he was hungry....?


          Maybe he trusted his chef who and thought clenbuterol would only be in lower quality beef, like I've heard many people here say would be the case.

          Again, the point that you refuse to acknowledge, is that 2 experts and now a hair test have sided with his story. They could be wrong, sure. But on the other side, there has been no solid evidence that this was from more than beef contamination.

          I'm not sure why you're so worked up about it. Let it go. He got 6 months and he'll be tested more. If you have some proof that it was from more than tainted beef, I'm sure the world would love to have it. Enlighten us!
          Tainted beef? No proof of that at all. It’s like Roy Jones saying that he took ripped fuel causing a positive for steroids.

          Let’s be clear here. There is still nothing that rules out that clenbuterol came into his body by way of the****utic use and the bottom line is that he made TWO positive tests for a banned substance. That’s the reality. He hasn’t been cleared of anything.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Dude, WADA doesn't test athletes. WADA doesn't even have DCO's.
            you obviously didnt read what I or the article in question that specified that the follicle samples were sent to Wada
            Last edited by maracho; 04-28-2018, 05:39 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
              Who wrote the naked capitalist?
              Was curious about that myself.. the provenance is odd.

              http://www.thedestructionofcivilizat...apitalist.html

              Written by a member of the political elite as a review and critique of a different book about a conspiracy by the capitalist elite to subjugate the rest of the us, and basically saying that's a good thing. Go figure.

              I got too many books on the go already and not enough time to finish 'em. I'm curious about this one... but not that curious. I already know the mega rich are basically fucking the rest of us over and many of the stratagems they use to obfusticate, numb, divide and conquer... it's countering that **** that I'm interested in now.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                Tainted beef? No proof of that at all.
                Over 109 soccer players tested positive for clenbuterol at the 2011 FIFA Under-17 World Cup in Mexico thanks to tainted beef.

                We know this is an issue in that country.

                What proof do you have that Canelo took this banned substance on purpose to gain an illegal advantage?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
                  Was curious about that myself.. the provenance is odd.

                  http://www.thedestructionofcivilizat...apitalist.html

                  Written by a member of the political elite as a review and critique of a different book about a conspiracy by the capitalist elite to subjugate the rest of the us, and basically saying that's a good thing. Go figure.

                  I got too many books on the go already and not enough time to finish 'em. I'm curious about this one... but not that curious. I already know the mega rich are basically fucking the rest of us over and many of the stratagems they use to obfusticate, numb, divide and conquer... it's countering that **** that I'm interested in now.
                  I know the mega-rich is getting away with a lot of ****. Where I don't agree with Shoulder is when narrows it down to a select group or family.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                    Tainted beef? No proof of that at all. It’s like Roy Jones saying that he took ripped fuel causing a positive for steroids.

                    Let’s be clear here. There is still nothing that rules out that clenbuterol came into his body by way of the****utic use and the bottom line is that he made TWO positive tests for a banned substance. That’s the reality. He hasn’t been cleared of anything.
                    I don't disagree with you. He is guilty of having a banned substance in his system.

                    But again, the point is that 2 experts and the hair test seem to corroborate his story. Just like there is no proof that he ate tainted beef, there is also no proof that he used Clen for an advantage. But having 2 experts and this test on his side should certainly be taken into account, shouldn't it?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                      Over 109 soccer players tested positive for clenbuterol at the 2011 FIFA Under-17 World Cup in Mexico thanks to tainted beef.

                      We know this is an issue in that country.

                      What proof do you have that Canelo took this banned substance on purpose to gain an illegal advantage?
                      You think the Powers That Be would allow the true evidence to come out. They already had this plan out that if he ever got caught just use the tainted beef excuse.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP