I think a lot of people owe Canelo an apology
Collapse
-
But it's not the same as being the devious, nefarious steroid pumping cheat that many posters here were making him out to be.Comment
-
lmao at all these people giving "support" to a cheater when you know dam well these same idiots would be all over pacquiao if pacquiao got caught with roids and said he didn't know what he was in his shakes.
if pacquiao got caught with a banned substance in his body and pacquiao blamed it on "ariza's shakes and accidental", a bunch of these "clenelo supporters" would be singing a very different tuneComment
-
Is it just the posters here, or do you want people like Floyd, Billy Joe, Paulie, etc that are in the business and accused Clenelo of cheating to apologize?Comment
-
2 Regardless of the time, your hair shows what you took and when. he could have waited 2 months. if it's in his system it's in his hair. They use hair forensics on athletes and things that have been dead for years to prove points.
3 Bio-markers aren't a film covering your hair, they are you hair. you can't bleach it out. It doesn't work like that.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23851910/
https://www.okorieokorocha.com/influencing-factors-hair-drug-tests/Comment
-
lmao at all these people giving "support" to a cheater when you know dam well these same idiots would be all over pacquiao if pacquiao got caught with roids and said he didn't know what he was in his shakes.
if pacquiao got caught with a banned substance in his body and pacquiao blamed it on "ariza's shakes and accidental", a bunch of these "clenelo supporters" would be singing a very different tune
No one is arguing that Canelo is innocent of having a banned substance in his system. We know that he did. What's being discussed is whether it was negligence or done with nefarious intent.
The difference is Pacquiao would be guilty of having someone on his team attempting to illegally improve his performance, whereas Canelo would only be guilty of eating meat, with neither he nor his team attempting to illegally improve his performance. That is a big difference.
Furthermore, whatever would be in those shakes would be there to improve performance, whereas Canelo's ingestion of tainted meat would give no benefit as per experts when discussing the amount in his system.Last edited by travestyny; 04-28-2018, 10:55 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
With his hair sample has come up negative it's clear that he wasn't doping or using clen as a masking agent for something worse.
The results are consistent with eating tainted meat.
The critics should now clear his name with the same publicity with which they besmirched it.Look at you fully trusting the official source when it suits you.
Well, I don't trust them. It was apart of the big conspiracy to preserve Canelo's name because he brings in a lot of money for the folks in power.
Can you dig it?Comment
Comment