I think a lot of people owe Canelo an apology

[travestyny]

Just to be clear, since the expert Conte says due to the hairtest Canelo could possibly actually only have eaten meat, you also agree to his statement that Floyd was most possibly masking PEDs when he used that IV vs Pacman?

Pick and choose, pick and choose.

Conte said CIR testing was needed.


CIR testing was done.


Try another angle.

[M Bison]

The only thing the hair sample prove was that he is indeed a ginger roided up pussay, two failed test no excuse.
He paid these people off for a fake hair test that more than likely never happened.

[Jubei]

Conte said CIR testing was needed.


CIR testing was done.


Try another angle.

I am not talking about CIR tests, i am talking about Floyds 750ml of IV thats only needed if you want to mask huge amount of PEDs.

In his private little clinic at home when VADA suddenly knocked on his door.

Again you pick and choose, pick and choose. I told you its about IV and you come up with CIR tests. Exposed another troll.

[StefanTosic]

With his hair sample has come up negative it's clear that he wasn't doping or using clen as a masking agent for something worse.

The results are consistent with eating tainted meat.

The critics should now clear his name with the same publicity with which they besmirched it.

I don't think so. Piss/blood test showed he was positive for clen, but hairtest showed he was negative for clen, plus it looks like the hair test was done only for clen and not for any other substances.

[travestyny]

I am not talking about CIR tests, i am talking about Floyds 750ml of IV thats only needed if you want to mask huge amount of PEDs.

In his private little clinic at home when VADA suddenly knocked on his door.

Your facts are all twisted, homie.

1. Conte did say CIR testing was needed. He said it in the article that Hauser used.

2. An IV only masks a urine test by dilution. Urine samples are checked for dilution twice. Once by the DCO and once by the independent WADA lab.

3. VADA didn't go knocking because VADA had nothing to do with this test. It was USADA that was in charge.

4. USADA's DCO didn't suddenly catch anyone. The DCO was there before the IV was administered. Hours before. Even Hauser has admit to that.

[maracho]

1st Clenbuterol is itself a powerful PED so its not neccissarily a masking agent.

2nd why did Canelo wait for over a month after his failed tests to provide the hair sample?

3rd repeated bleaching of hair can leach out all signs of drug use

[mlac]

this forum just keeps reaching new levels of ******ation

i cant actually tell whether the TS is trolling or not.

[Dudley]

yea..............

Links I'd like to see your links.

Bio-markers might be "hard to find" but testing hair is a gold standard in sports and courts to prove the intent of the accused. I don't even care about Canelo being banned, what you guys are saying is ridiculous, people go to jail over this ****. Hair testing has been accurate since 2005 and is used in allot of courts to see what people are putting in their bodies. You can't edit or change what's in your hair, and regarding the difficulty of looking for drugs doesn't mean because it's hard, it's inaccurate. You would just take MORE SAMPLES.

[Dudley]

Science = fact

1st Clenbuterol is itself a powerful PED so its not neccissarily a masking agent.

2nd why did Canelo wait for over a month after his failed tests to provide the hair sample?

3rd repeated bleaching of hair can leach out all signs of drug use

2 Regardless of the time, your hair shows what you took and when. he could have waited 2 months. if it's in his system it's in his hair. They use hair forensics on athletes and things that have been dead for years to prove points.

3 Bio-markers aren't a film covering your hair, they are you hair. you can't bleach it out. It doesn't work like that.

[ShoulderRoll]

this forum just keeps reaching new levels of ******ation

i cant actually tell whether the TS is trolling or not.

You can accuse Canelo of not being more careful about eating tainted meat.

But to imply that he was deliberately doping and a cheater was out of line based on the facts. I think some posters let their hate show and made it personal, which was wrong.