Ca$hnelo is Clean. BOSS.

[bigdunny1]

Idiots think you can't get it out of your hair in 3 weeks.

No you can't. You don't just shampoo your hair and get rid of if. That's not how it works LMAO it's a scientific fact it stays in your hair follicles for months not 3 weeks. But you know more then the experts like Victor Conte.

[stealthradon]

No you can't. You don't just shampoo your hair and get rid of if. That's not how it works LMAO it's a scientific fact it stays in your hair follicles for months not 3 weeks. But you know more then the experts like Victor Conte.

http://bigthink.com/think-tank/lance-armstrongs-guide-to-passing-a-drug-test

https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/addiction/news/20080728/drug-test-cheats-try-new-tricks-on-labs#1

""Does it work? Yes, it does," says Amitava Dasgupta, PhD, a professor of pathology and drug testing expert from the University of Texas-Houston Medical Center. "It's a cat and mouse game.""

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4595642/

[Evil_Meat]

No you can't. You don't just shampoo your hair and get rid of if. That's not how it works LMAO it's a scientific fact it stays in your hair follicles for months not 3 weeks. But you know more then the experts like Victor Conte.

You're arrogant, immature, and wrong.

[bigdunny1]

You're arrogant, immature, and wrong.

how so?

There are differences in the methods of analysis used for urine & hair. If Canelo were dosing daily (30-100 mcgs) w/ clenbuterol in 2 week cycles then hair testing would detect this activity. Eating a meat meal w/ trace amounts of clenbuterol may not be detected in a hair.

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 29, 2018

CANELO: I predict hair testing for clenbuterol will be implemented by WADA in the not too distant future. Uninformed scribes that are attacking hair testing do not seem to understand that many WADA tests have limitations & variations w/ allowable limits arbitrarily established. https://t.co/pp5W5EFE0p

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 28, 2018

CANELO: I've personally talked w/ the director of the Salt Lake City lab that did the Canelo hair test for clenbuterol. He is well informed in regards 2 the proper sample collection & testing procedures. Even CIR/IRMS test for testosterone has limitations & variations. https://t.co/pp5W5EFE0p

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 28, 2018

CANELO: Hair & Urine testing 4 clenbuterol provide different types of info. Urine is recent two weeks exposure. Hair can be from a month up to six months or longer back. If you are trying to determine "intent to cheat" or abuse then hair is a better sample than urine.@edgraney https://t.co/pp5W5EFE0p

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 28, 2018

[Scopedog]

Nice try, but it doesn't have the same ring to it as Clenelo Alvaroid

[Citizen Koba]

He had 2 urine tests that DID show trace Clenbuterol. Urine tests measure ~2-3 weeks in the past

Hair follicle test - gives ~6-8 months of data regarding drug use.

Dont listen to me...Victor Conte is saying this is huge and basically frees BO$$ from all guilt.

Hell Victor even suggested the hair follicle test will be the new standard

Yes. There's a very good reason it isn't the standard now though, and that's because insufficient research has been done to ensure the reliability and consistency of the results.

Conte is waaaay overselling this to the extent one has to wonder why. WADA themselves say that it can't provide conclusive proof of anything with hair samples.

https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1063005/wada-have-no-magic-solution-to-know-if-clenbuterol-positives-due-to-doping-or-contaminated-meat

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) concede that they currently have no scientific means to distinguish whether failed drug tests for clenbuterol have resulted from contaminated meat or genuine doping.

"We are running some studies to try to distinguish but we don't have a magic solution today," Rabin told insidethegames here at the WADA Symposium.

From what it looks like NSAC / GBP basically asked for hair sampling because people were saying they should, even though the experts told them it was entirely likely that they wouldn't be able to get a useful result.

We initiated the test to be as comprehensive as possible but knowing it’s very difficult, according to the experts,” Bennett said. “It’s a difficult process to be able to confirm whether there is clenbuterol in the hair follicles, but I talked to (SMRTL president and laboratory director) Dr. (Michael) Eichner and he said they’d run the test even though it is even more difficult to run on light-colored hair. But we sent them the samples and the tests came back negative.

[bigdunny1]

Yes. There's a very good reason it isn't the standard now though, and that's because insufficient research has been done to ensure the reliability and consistency of the results.

Conte is waaaay overselling this to the extent one has to wonder why. WADA themselves say that it can't provide conclusive proof of anything with hair samples.

https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1063005/wada-have-no-magic-solution-to-know-if-clenbuterol-positives-due-to-doping-or-contaminated-meat

From what it looks like NSAC / GBP basically asked for hair sampling because people were saying they should, even though the experts told them it was entirely likely that they wouldn't be able to get a useful result.

https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/hair_testing_symposium_oct2017.pdf

Link to WADA themselves stating they recommend hair testing "to provide additional evidence in doping cases
of potential (clenbuterol) contaminations" for low urinary trace examples (EXACTLY what Canelo had)

WADA Report: "A proposed threshold of 1…5 pg/mg clenbuterol in hair could contribute
to discriminate most of the pending clenbuterol cases" https://t.co/perPNdOpMR@edgraney

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 28, 2018

WADA REPORT CONCLUSION: Clenbuterol testing in HAIR samples. "Hair Testing potentially suitable to confirm Clenbuterol Doping at low urinary concentrations!"@edgraney Hair samples should be used as an adjunctive test to urine for clenbuterol https://t.co/LgrqB0VINt

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 28, 2018

Yes Ed I do see a time in the near future when WADA will establish a threshold of between 2-5 pg/mg for clenbuterol in hair as an allowable limit. Above this threshold will be considered a positive doping result. Regardless of limitations. Hair is a scientifically valid sample. https://t.co/pp5W5EFE0p

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 28, 2018

CANELO: I've personally talked w/ the director of the Salt Lake City lab that did the Canelo hair test for clenbuterol. He is well informed in regards 2 the proper sample collection & testing procedures. Even CIR/IRMS test for testosterone has limitations & variations. https://t.co/pp5W5EFE0p

— Victor Conte (@VictorConte) April 28, 2018

[Boksfan]

Clenelo is Clen fighter.

[bigdunny1]

Victor Conte also shoots holes in the latest conspiracy theory that the hair that tested negative wasn't even Canelo's. lol They have strict procedures in how they collect the hair. So idiots no you can't just hand over a red hair you get from the zoo from an orangutan to fool WADA. Hair also contains a person's specific DNA. And states folks saying well hair test have variations to discredit it are ignorant to drug testing even urine and other drug tests have variations. Finally states that WADA almost certainly will change standards to include hair testing AND allowing for specific low levels of Clenbuerol in your body for cases such like Canelo's with meat contamination.

[Vasyl’s dad]

The fight was canceled because he had clenbuerol in his system. But the question is how did it get there. He was being accused by fans of being a cheater on PEDs. He said he is Clean Fighter And Ate Contaminated meat. Hair test goes back 6 months and negative for PEDS. Consistent with meat contamination.

He canceled the fight though. What clean fighter cancels a fight?