Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Canelo Will Get Tested Every Day From Now Until Fight
Collapse
-
-
I was one of the first morons on this site to totally accept the "tainted beef" excuse. The letter from the company that did the testing concerning the first failed test which outright stated the level was low enough to be in line with the beef was good enough for me. The confirmed use of the crap in actual beef producers in Mexico was completely true. I love the boxing style of Alvarez, appreciate him for how improved he was since his horrid showing against Mayweather (a fight he couldn't walk away from but was nowhere near ready to step up to) and generally think he kept an entire promotion alive all by himself. I was a moderate fan, only irritated for the dropping of a MW belt he was holding to avoid Golovkin with the excuse he wasn't a real MW. But still, I liked and respected him. Defended him.
Then, the second test showed nearly the same exact levels. Then came other accusations. Then came a refusal to allow other testing right off base to clear his name. Then came insults from his camp that Golovkin wanted out of the fight, not that it was Alvarez fault. Then came that press conference when they pulled out of the rematch with the dog and pony show in which he STILL took no ownership. Everyone else's fault, everyone else was being unreasonable.
I defended this guy. my bad. I apologize to every poster I argued with.
Just to clear things up - the second test DID NOT show the exact same levels, but in fact, showed how much would be expected after a day or two or further metabolization (i.e. there was like .8 found in his first test, and then .08 in the next test).
What tests were these he refused?
I DO AGREE 100% that Alvarez intentionally ingested clenbuterol to get a competitive advantage, though.
Just wanted to clear a few things up.Comment
-
A failed drug test is physical evidence.
Oh, and I know, circumstantial evidence can be VERY powerful; often, it can be even more powerful than physical evidence. The circumstantial evidence for Manny, is somewhat convincing, I admit.
Acne IS evidence - it's a known side effect of androgen-based steroids.
of testing positive for clen, not for cheating
you need to prove intent
perhaps read my post again
I said that I don't need " physical evidence "..... IF, I know
because, this is not a court of law
nobody can hide behind the burden of proof here
I see that you must feel similarly, considering your admission about Pac
but yea, acne is not evidence lol..... it is a possible indicator
although...... that sounds about as silly as the big-head "evidence" that guys used to say about Manny
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
just saying you cant accuse other with acne of juicing then ignore others with the same acneComment
-
Everyone is talking like a rematch is a certainty but what people fail to understand is GG has to face the might of Vanes first, how can anyone be so sure GG beats him ?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment