Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Sulecki: Danny Jacobs Won't Ever Repeat Golovkin Performance

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by davidw9785 View Post
    Good post. I agree. He lost his fight with GGG clearly. Seems like a prime example of where a guy exceeds expectations and all of a sudden people think he almost won. He gets way too much credit for his fight with GGG. And when people say he won it... that's laughable
    I agree with your perspective but I'll add that I would confidently pick Jacobs in a rematch.

    Most people that saw the fight realized that Jacob clearly had the tools but not the right game plan. Had Jacobs moved around the ring like Saunders he would have picked up more rounds.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Boksfan View Post
      What is it good for if he can't lay anything on Jacobs because of his very short hands?
      Even though Sulecki annihilated the guy that Charlo fought it's going to be his turn to taste the canvas.

      I'm picking Jacobs in 6, too much talent, far too many tools.

      Comment


      • #13
        If he was right, it doesnt bode well as ultimately, Jacobs lost.

        Comment


        • #14
          How would he know if Jacobs could ever repeat that performance? I would think knocking out Quillen in the first round would be considered a better performance.

          And the excuse that Golovkin was so-so... Maybe he couldn't do what he wanted because Jacobs wouldn't let him. What most people didn't acknowledge about the fight is that Golovkin couldn't go in his seek and destroy mode because he was worried about Jacobs speed and power. Jacobs landed a huge right hand towards the end of the first round (the only significant punch landed in the round) that knocked Golovkin a little off balance. That changed the whole fight plan Golovkin. He should be lucky he got that partly landed, half slipped, half push KD.

          Comment


          • #15
            what 'performance' since when was it such a great achievmeent to go 12 rounds and lose? and i could have sworn wooden spoon was an offensive fighter, why did he run all night against someone half his size?

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Boksfan View Post
              What is it good for if he can't lay anything on Jacobs because of his very short hands?
              This shows how little you know about Sulecki. I guess that you belive in fake 68 inch reach from boxrec. Sulecki real reach is 71,5 inches.

              Sulecki output is near to 100 punches per round, while DJ throws no more than 50 punches per round. The bigest question is if Sulecki can take Jacobs punch. If he can then prepare for an upset.

              I saw Sulecki recent sparring with Mark Heffron (big dude) and he looked very good. He is in best shape of his life. For my money it is a 50/50 fight.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by PolishStrawweig View Post
                This shows how little you know about Sulecki. I guess that you belive in fake 68 inch reach from boxrec. Sulecki real reach is 71,5 inches.

                Sulecki output is near to 100 punches per round, while DJ throws no more than 50 punches per round. The bigest question is if Sulecki can take Jacobs punch. If he can then prepare for an upset.

                I saw Sulecki recent sparring with Mark Heffron (big dude) and he looked very good. He is in best shape of his life. For my money it is a 50/50 fight.
                If I knew a lot about Sulecki I wouldn't ask that questions, would I?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Boksfan View Post
                  If I knew a lot about Sulecki I wouldn't ask that questions, would I?
                  Ok, so if you were only asking if ”Sulecki is skinny, short reach and no power” then I can tell you that its not the case (he was cutting a lot to make a junior middleweight).
                  Of course DJ is slightly better in every of those departments, but Sulecki can box at much higher pace. Also he has the skills and is a true warrior.

                  Looking at betting odds, it seems like people are sleeping on Sulecki because they dont know who he is, but it will change very soon.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by PolishStrawweig View Post
                    Ok, so if you were only asking if ”Sulecki is skinny, short reach and no power” then I can tell you that its not the case (he was cutting a lot to make a junior middleweight).
                    Of course DJ is slightly better in every of those departments, but Sulecki can box at much higher pace. Also he has the skills and is a true warrior.

                    Looking at betting odds, it seems like people are sleeping on Sulecki because they dont know who he is, but it will change very soon.
                    That's how he looks on paper and that's how people see him. He can change that beating Jacobs. People will know who he is.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP