Comments Thread For: Charlo Wants to Test Himself Against Golovkin 'On the Way Out'
Collapse
-
-
Do you really need to see him vs Murray or Lemieux to know he would destroy them? He would absolutely demolish lemieux no defense having self.Comment
-
I don't get the, he should fight this guy or that guy first mindset. Contenders are supposed to pop up, and the champion has to knock them down. Never in my life have I seen fans of a champion speak more about who he shouldn't have to fight than who they want to see him fight.
I want to see Charlo Golovkin Jacobs Alvarez Saunders in the ring vs each other. And no, not interested in a Golovkin Alvarez rematch. That ship has sailed.Comment
-
Very sad. Is Charlo the most avoided boxer in the MW division now? Nobody wants to fight him? GGG and Canelo are ducking 100%. What about Jacobs, Saunders, Andrade, Derevyanchenko? Are they really ducking Charlo? or Charlo wants boxers only in the level of Hugo Centeno?Comment
-
Funny thing about facts, is nobody gives a **** about them, but they always come back to bite you! Look at Golovkin's opponents from 2006-2010 including Nunes! Then look at Charlo's opponents from 2008-2015 including Bundrage! They both fought nobodies, but here's the difference: GGG started at 24, Charlo started at 18!Comment
-
yup. Maxi knew what I was saying.Funny thing about facts, is nobody gives a **** about them, but they always come back to bite you! Look at Golovkin's opponents from 2006-2010 including Nunes! Then look at Charlo's opponents from 2008-2015 including Bundrage! They both fought nobodies, but here's the difference: GGG started at 24, Charlo started at 18!
There seems to be a formula at MW-ko bums until they rank you #1 contender. GGG used it perfectly. Now others are copying it.Comment
-
Stop spreading b.s. That fight wasn't close. The closest card between any judge or writer was 115 - 113 (one judge). And only one person (out of over a dozen cards I checked) had that score. The rest were at least 116 - 112.
He beats them all w/ maybe GGG as the exception right now.Comment
-
Comment
Comment