Comments Thread For: Khan: Fury is Best Heavyweight - Joshua, Wilder Still Untested
Collapse
-
the wlad that fought fury (i use the term fought very loosely) didnt try to win and fury barely won.
had they fought a couple of years prior, its a cakewalk for wlad.
go on and have the last word. im done and so was wladComment
-
Klistcko is still a better opponent than anything on wilders resume including Ortiz heck I would say if parker and Ortiz would to fight next I bet u Parker would beat OrtizWrong again, lol. Just because AJ is the money maker doesn't make him the best; he's just more popular. Wilder is the best because he's beaten the best opposition in Ortiz, but AJ is close behind.
Just because you have a belt and are more popular make you a better fighter. Ortiz is MUCH BETTER than Parker.Comment
-
Again, you think because Parker was a champ because he went the distance with AJ that he's better than what he actually is. Just because most casual fans don't know who Ortiz is doesn't make Parker better. Most real fans would tell you Ortiz would whoop Parker.
Klitch is tougher to call, but Ortiz-klitch fight would be a 50/50 fightComment
-
-
I for one would have would see Parker vs Ortiz they are about the same size 6 ‘4 Parker is younger and faster Ortiz is slow as hell and Parker has grea chin. Klistcko would beat Ortiz and Parker and with wilder I would favor klistcko with 60/40 well at least the klistcko that fought AJ at least klistcko ain’t 6’4 he’s same height as AJ and wilder 6’’6Again, you think because Parker was a champ because he went the distance with AJ that he's better than what he actually is. Just because most casual fans don't know who Ortiz is doesn't make Parker better. Most real fans would tell you Ortiz would whoop Parker.
Klitch is tougher to call, but Ortiz-klitch fight would be a 50/50 fightComment
Comment