Cuellar is Coming off a Loss and 16-month Lay-Off

[bigdunny1]

I have no problem with this fight it's decent test for tank. But I have a major problem with it being for a title, it was first reported as a secondary title which I could live with but now it's for super title at the expense of downgrading machado status as champ. When he's the man who beat the man. This phuking bs for a fight with a guy coming off a loss moving up weight from 16 month layoff.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

He's also going up a weight class... he has fought at 130 before, but not for over 6 years.

Good point. You gotta be slick to slide that in there. He HAS fought at the weight, but not in over six years. Total expose.

[Larry the boss]

I dont hear anyone trying to hype this fight up at all tho

[Tony Trick-Pony]

bruddas of the usyk are psychically connected

What affects one of us, affects all of us.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Exactly. What does this have to do with G anyways? Is it some kind of automatic reflex to bring him up when talking about any other fighter?

“In todays news, 3 people were trappped in an elevator in a down town high rise”
Robbie Barret - yea but little g lost back to back to jacobs and canelo and now cant sell a fight so he moves to stub hub to fight vanes. He ducked ward.

[Zaroku]

Not as bad as Golovkin. At least Cuellar is a former title holder. Vanes has never been at that level.

Vanes always swings for the fences... he is game... I respect that man.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

I have no problem with this fight it's decent test for tank. But I have a major problem with it being for a title, it was first reported as a secondary title which I could live with but now it's for super title at the expense of downgrading machado status as champ. When he's the man who beat the man. This phuking bs for a fight with a guy coming off a loss moving up weight from 16 month layoff.

Yeah, the title situation in this one is f'd up. That's the politics of boxing for ya.