Boxing should only have 3 belts per division?? thoughts

**mlac** · 04-19-2018, 09:09 AM

It should have 1 imo.

**Holler** · 04-19-2018, 09:10 AM

Originally posted by boxing90

& ex boxers as judges....

If we're getting a vote I'm all for one belt per division.

**DuckAdonis** · 04-19-2018, 09:12 AM

No......1 belt

**Armchairhero** · 04-19-2018, 09:13 AM

This is painfully obvious to everyone, would rid the sport of so many problems and fights that should be made....

**HanzGruber** · 04-19-2018, 09:15 AM

It would have 1 ideally. Even 3 would be an improvement. But never gonna happen

**Eff Pandas** · 04-19-2018, 09:17 AM

Whats superior about 3 belts vs 1 belt?

And a problem with the 3 belts is you got 3 top ten rankings too.

I used to nerd out on the rankings. With the 4 titles we consider major now that means you could have up to 40 guys in the top ten lol. Granted usually its more like 25ish guys, but its still goofy not only do we not got The Champion anymore we got 25ish guys in the top ten as dumb as that sounds.

**_Rexy_** · 04-19-2018, 09:18 AM

1 per division would be best

At this point I'd be happy with 1 WBA belt per division.

**SAINTSTEVE** · 04-19-2018, 09:28 AM

If there's an advantage to having four belts over one I'd say it is harder for one man to hold the division hostage by being inactive, or ducking someone etc.

**Boxfan83** · 04-19-2018, 09:55 AM

2 belts would be ok, sorta like how baseball has the AL and NL, Football has the Afc and Nfc, and Basketball has the East and the West.

As far as judges, I have heard some former pros give some terrible judgements after fights. Personally I think judges at the championship level should go through quarterly training and be subject to polygraph especially in Nevada where there can be millions of betting dollars on the line.

I also think there should be 5 judges for championship fights, 3 ringside, and 2 judges watching closed circuit.

Boxing should only have 3 belts per division?? thoughts