Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua Vows To "Go To War" With Deontay Wilder, Not Box

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post
    Every last Joshua Try Hard here is trolling lmao...
    You're one of the biggest trolls on the forum.

    And it isn't trolling if it is in fact true what people are saying.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
      You're one of the biggest trolls on the forum.

      And it isn't trolling if it is in fact true what people are saying.
      You think Raggatard is trolling ?

      Nope , hes actually that ****** .

      Im not even sure hes smart enough to troll ?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
        Couldn't you have gone back to my last post???

        Anyway... You said Parker could have won the fight with different judges, so I asked what your score-card was for AJ/Parker.
        Just like the judges on the night, my scores will be dependent on the size of Eddie Hearns "Judges Fee" cheque.

        If I was not being bribed I would score it a lot closer as most of the rounds were very even. Every boxing expert who commented on this has come out saying the scoring and ref were terrible. Just do a google and you will find plenty.

        Comment


        • Anyone with half a brain can see how this fight is going to go.

          There's a reason why Wilder's record is built on slow guys with average footwork - stationary targets make wild shots look far better than they are.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
            You have to be a special idiot to take Wilder after seeing the Ortiz fight ......
            I'll be sure to find you and bet you all of your points if/when they fight. You'll learn the hard way like aj. I guess

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Jkp View Post
              Just like the judges on the night, my scores will be dependent on the size of Eddie Hearns "Judges Fee" cheque.

              If I was not being bribed I would score it a lot closer as most of the rounds were very even. Every boxing expert who commented on this has come out saying the scoring and ref were terrible. Just do a google and you will find plenty.

              I'll ask you one last time numb-nuts, what was YOUR scorecard?

              Answer the question, ******.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
                I'll ask you one last time numb-nuts, what was YOUR scorecard?

                Answer the question, ******.
                I had it very even fight. AJ had 1 point deducted for biting and pulling off his tape. And another point deducted for cutting parker with his elbow.
                Last edited by Jkp; 04-16-2018, 07:14 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Jkp View Post
                  I had it very even fight. AJ had 1 point deducted for biting and pulling off his tape. And another point deducted for cutting parker with his elbow.
                  Then you don't know how to score a fight for ****. AJ clearly won. Parker did nothing other than hit fresh air all night. He was far too scared of being in range because of what would have come back at him.

                  The tape was already loose, ******.

                  The elbow wasn't on purpose. That's just the way boxing goes sometimes when they clash heads or an elbow hits them in the face. So no points taken for either of the nonsense you're talking about.

                  But I can see you're REALLY bitter, so continue in your delusional hate because your hero was well beaten. Toodle pip.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
                    I call Fury a runner too. But I don't see you slag off Parker for putting in that kind of performance the way you do Fury. You're a hypocrite.

                    AJ couldn't land anything significant because Parker was being far too defensive and worrying about what was coming back at him all night. It's hard to get your shots off against that kind of opponent. But hey, it doesn't matter because AJ won easy and took what he was after... Parker's title.

                    You're making too much out of the ref. But it's not surprising because you were saying Parker was going to win and became extremely bitter when he let you down and lost easily. Joshua didn't even need to get out of first gear.

                    If the judges were different Parker could have won? Haha the judges were neutral you idiot. 1 from the US, 1 from NZ, and 1 from the UK. They got it right. Why, what was your scorecard? Don't duck this question like you did last time. Parker wouldn't have won even if his own family scored the fight.

                    You keep on calling AJ juiced. Have you got any proof? Or are you just being a typical poisonous little troll who can't handle the truth so goes on a bitter smear campaign?

                    Oh, have you stopped saying Joshua will gas out if it goes the distance like you did with this fight? Hahaha. Pathetic little creature.

                    Parker was much smaller? AJ only had 2 inches of height and 6lbs in weight on him. You're exaggerating again aren't you? Quite sad really.

                    I wrote off Parker because he DIDN'T stand a chance. Parker didn't believe he could do it either, that's why he backed up all night and looked to stay out of trouble. He never once really tried to win. He knew his place you see even after all his big man talk. AJ took his title with ease.

                    One day you're going to have to get over your bitterness and stop spreading poison, it's not a good look for an adult.
                    Your God AJ just confirmed he intentionally tried to make the fight as boring as possible. But keep blaming parker if it makes you feel better.

                    You can bet Eddie, the referee and judges were all in on this strategy to make the fight as boring and uneventful as possible, and keep AJ out of danger.

                    Must suck being proved wrong constantly.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Jkp View Post
                      Your God AJ just confirmed he intentionally tried to make the fight as boring as possible. But keep blaming parker if it makes you feel better.

                      You can bet Eddie, the referee and judges were all in on this strategy to make the fight as boring and uneventful as possible, and keep AJ out of danger.

                      Must suck being proved wrong constantly.
                      AJ said he was being smart, sticking to the game plan of using his jab and not over-reaching so Parker couldn't get his counters off. He didn't say he made the fight as boring as possible. It was boring, but he never intended for it to be that way.

                      Parker kept at a distance where he couldn't get his shots off and Joshua wasn't able to counter. Parker did the same against Ruiz. So yes, Parker was to blame for moving off the back-foot and being too scared to be at the correct distance to get his shots off. Believing otherwise shows nothing but pure delusion on your part.

                      How can the judges make a fight boring or not you complete nutter? You're just waffling **** at this point that makes no sense. Parker losing has really messed you up hasn't it? Haha.

                      Do you think the NZ judge was paid off or something?

                      You're proving me wrong? Haha. As I say, you're delusional. You haven't proved anyone wrong.

                      Can't wait to see what you come back with. But can it be as mad as saying judges can make fights boring even though they have nothing to do with how the fight goes. Haha.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP