Deontay Wilders attendance in fights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #41
    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
    Hearn said on twitter there was no "take it or leave it"
    Hearn says a lot of stuff

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #42
      Originally posted by BattlingNelson
      I can't know obviously, but I interpret it as a signal to team Wilder about getting serious (from Hearn's point of view).
      And a flat fee is supposed to be considered serious?

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #43
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        Hearn says a lot of stuff
        Wouldn't be hard for Wilders team to prove him wrong, which makes me doubt he'd lie about it.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #44
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
          Wouldn't be hard for Wilders team to prove him wrong, which makes me doubt he'd lie about it.
          Two weeks ago Hearn said he hadn’t had any conversations with anyone. Few days later, he said they had been talking for a while. So why would anyone worry about proving anything? They want to make a fight, not convince folks who believe what they want anyway.

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #45
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            Two weeks ago Hearn said he hadn’t had any conversations with anyone. Few days later, he said they had been talking for a while. So why would anyone worry about proving anything? They want to make a fight, not convince folks who believe what they want anyway.
            Two weeks ago Finkel said they weren't talking. If they were then Wilders team lied too. So why do you believe the "take it or leave it"?

            Because YOU WANT TO, it suits your biased view.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #46
              Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
              Two weeks ago Finkel said they weren't talking. If they were then Wilders team lied too. So why do you believe the "take it or leave it"?

              Because YOU WANT TO, it suits your biased view.
              Then they lied too. Not interested in winning a message board battle about who lied or adding emjois to underscore a weak point. But a flat fee offer is silly, with or without a caveat.

              Comment

              • BattlingNelson
                Mod a Phukka
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 29840
                • 3,246
                • 3,191
                • 286,536

                #47
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                And a flat fee is supposed to be considered serious?
                I don't think so, but neither is a call for a 60-40 or 50-50 split.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #48
                  Originally posted by BattlingNelson
                  I don't think so, but neither is a call for a 60-40 or 50-50 split.
                  Maybe 35-40, I think. The important part of that sentence is “I think” lol. There are sk many factors at play, I can’t pretend to know what %. But the reason why folks deal in percentage is because you don’t know what PPV may generate, international rights, etc etc. Offering a flat fee is silly.

                  Comment

                  • BattlingNelson
                    Mod a Phukka
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 29840
                    • 3,246
                    • 3,191
                    • 286,536

                    #49
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    Maybe 35-40, I think. The important part of that sentence is “I think” lol. There are sk many factors at play, I can’t pretend to know what %. But the reason why folks deal in percentage is because you don’t know what PPV may generate, international rights, etc etc. Offering a flat fee is silly.
                    Agree. Just as silly as iit was for Floyd to offer a flat fee to Pac.

                    Comment

                    • Raggamuffin
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2016
                      • 8195
                      • 453
                      • 961
                      • 43,263

                      #50
                      Originally posted by larryxxx..
                      Johann Duhaupas -8,471

                      Artur Szpilka -12,668

                      Chris Arreola-11,974

                      Gerald Washington-12,346

                      Stiverne 2-10,924

                      Ortiz-14,069

                      SO WHY DO PEOPLE SAY HE CAN'T DRAW????
                      I guess because it isn’t 80,000 with a low gate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP