If you have honest questions, I'll be happy to answer them, but don't lump me in with anybody else. You've never seen me call Joshua a glass jawed robot or say that Wilder would easily knock him out. I see it as a pick 'em fight. I favored Joshua slightly, but after his performance against Parker, I now favor Wilder slightly. It can go either way IMO and they're clearly the two best boxers on the planet.
As for whether double his best pay "is enough" or not, that's not how business works. You could say the same thing about Joshua. Is double his best pay not enough? This is the biggest fight that can be made in boxing right now. It's never going to happen on a flat fee. That would be ridiculous. Parker got one third and Wilder clearly deserves a higher percentage than Parker.
Hearn is very intelligent. Hearn is a great promoter. His opening offer is obviously going to be a low ball. If it wasn't, he should be fired for incompetence. He's doing his job. His job is to make a low ball offer initially. This is how it works. Anybody saying it's not a low ball offer is basically saying Hearn has no idea what he's doing and is a horrible promoter.
As for whether double his best pay "is enough" or not, that's not how business works. You could say the same thing about Joshua. Is double his best pay not enough? This is the biggest fight that can be made in boxing right now. It's never going to happen on a flat fee. That would be ridiculous. Parker got one third and Wilder clearly deserves a higher percentage than Parker.
Hearn is very intelligent. Hearn is a great promoter. His opening offer is obviously going to be a low ball. If it wasn't, he should be fired for incompetence. He's doing his job. His job is to make a low ball offer initially. This is how it works. Anybody saying it's not a low ball offer is basically saying Hearn has no idea what he's doing and is a horrible promoter.
Comment