The thing is Breadman said he knew Canelo was on PED's way before he got popped... Now what kinda shet is that?? The way I see it is if you got something to say then speak on it! Don't speak up after the fact!
That makes him look like a biitch in my eyes!
Now I can already see it... If another fighter gets popped for PED's( especially if it's a Mexican fighter)
this motherfuccer Breadman is gonna say he knew all along the fighter was on PED's.
Well if he thinks The Charlos are on PEDs then why not say it? Cause they black?? He don't wanna bring any negative attention to a black fighter??
He should speak on it. He said it himself you can't accuse anyone without facts. But you sure can say you suspect someone is on PED's and not get legally in trouble for it.. So if he knows he won't get sued for saying he suspects someone is on PED's then why not say it? What is he afraid of??
He just pissed me off when he said he knew Canelo was on PED's way before he got popped.
Even if he did why say it now? What's that point of saying it now?
The motherfuccer should of spoke up before Canelo got popped!
This we both agree on. He does seem to always give Black fighters the benefit of the doubt.
I like Dougie Fish probably the best.
Fat Dan is too much of a corporate ass kisser. Bread let's race get in the way too much. Dougie seems the most down to earth. But he's been getting blasted all over the place for defending Canelo...
The thing is Breadman said he knew Canelo was on PED's way before he got popped... Now what kinda shet is that?? The way I see it is if you got something to say then speak on it! Don't speak up after the fact!
That makes him look like a biitch in my eyes!
Now I can already see it... If another fighter gets popped for PED's( especially if it's a Mexican fighter)
this motherfuccer Breadman is gonna say he knew all along the fighter was on PED's.
Well if he thinks The Charlos are on PEDs then why not say it? Cause they black?? He don't wanna bring any negative attention to a black fighter??
He should speak on it. He said it himself you can't accuse anyone without facts. But you sure can say you suspect someone is on PED's and not get legally in trouble for it.. So if he knows he won't get sued for saying he suspects someone is on PED's then why not say it? What is he afraid of??
He just pissed me off when he said he knew Canelo was on PED's way before he got popped.
Even if he did why say it now? What's that point of saying it now?
The motherfuccer should of spoke up before Canelo got popped!
Yeah Bread always seems to speak after the fact, and it aint a good look.
When Jrock got KTFO by Charlo, has said he didn't understand why Charlo didn't ask for Vada testing, but then the question is did he and Jrock ask for Vada testing? Answer is no they didn't ask for it either so why complain after your fighter gets KTFO.
Then he said it was su****ious that the. Charlo fight was all of a sudden postponed (compounded by the lack of vada testing) and claimed that it was because Charlo wanted more time to cycle.
However, one can easily find the reason for the postponement with a google search, Charlo had an eye surgery to fix his eye sight, it was revealed he had been fighting practically half blind for quite a while and even up to the Trout fight, so after fighting Trout, he said enough and had the eye surgery done, which is why the Jrock fight date was postponed. (Also his twin brother had the exact same eye problem some years back and had it fixed with surgery.).
So I agree, Breadman needs to speak up on this ish before because speaking in hindsight just makes him look like a total whiny bish.
I do disagree completely with the race bait you put there. There is absolutely nothing to suggest Breadman has any racial favoritism, in fact, Breadman is biased in favor of Pac, Lomachenko, and especially GGG. He always speaks up for those guys even when it is pretty clear that he shouldn't. Pac, Lomachenko, GGG, and Ward are his favorites from what I can tell. Those guys can never do wrong in his eyes.
So yes he is guilty of favoritism, but not on racial grounds as you suggested.
Comment