Comments Thread For: Shields Offers Charlo, Lara To Replace Canelo, Fight Golovkin

[Raggamuffin]

name 1 fighter who died in the ring because his opponent was using steroids

because..... I CAN name a fighter who died in the ring because he was badly overmatched

so..... not all of us are lacking in data

forget demanding "proof"..... it is clearly obvious that Golovkin fighting Munguia would be a horrible mismatch

FACT: that fight was refused for safety reasons

not making a big deal out of it, just saying.....

Name one fighter who died in the ring because his opponent was using PEDs? So basically you are saying that in the history of boxing that nobody ever killed a man using PEDs? You said no big deal? Ok

[aboutfkntime]

Name one fighter who died in the ring because his opponent was using PEDs? So basically you are saying that in the history of boxing that nobody ever killed a man using PEDs? You said no big deal? Ok

I asked you to name 1 fighter, and you couldn't..... despite accusing me of running with inaccurate data

and all I said was.,....

FACT: it is clearly obvious that Golovkin fighting Munguia would be a horrible mismatch

FACT: that fight was refused for safety reasons

FACT: Golovkin could have walked into an unfair fight against Canelo

FACT: Manguia WOULD have walked into an unfair fight against Golovkin

see the difference ?

[aboutfkntime]

NOBODY is justifying steroid abuse.....

just for a sec, lets assume that Canelo intentionally cheated

that would mean.....

1) Canelo intentionally used supplements that he knew would give him an advantage

whereas.....

2) Golovkin intentionally selected an opponent that he KNEW was not on his level, so that he would have an advantage

are you asking me to pick which one is lamer ?

Canelo was lamer, and if found guilty, he should be banned

Golovkin is nearly as lame, because has been doing this for his entire career..... so he should be ridiculed for it and not taken seriously as a fighter

as least Canelo is willing to fight a favored opponent

[Raggamuffin]

I asked you to name 1 fighter, and you couldn't..... despite accusing me of running with inaccurate data

and all I said was.,....

FACT: it is clearly obvious that Golovkin fighting Munguia would be a horrible mismatch

FACT: that fight was refused for safety reasons

FACT: Golovkin could have walked into an unfair fight against Canelo

FACT: Manguia WOULD have walked into an unfair fight against Golovkin

see the difference ?

Your data isn't inaccurate. You have no data! You're talking to the wrong poster. There is no couldn't. I didn't even try to do the research. That takes time to do. That's your weak argument. You don't have stats on anything. You're just throwing random comments out there to suit your agenda. You sound like a butthurt Canelo fan.

[aboutfkntime]

Your data isn't inaccurate. You have no data! You're talking to the wrong poster. There is no couldn't. I didn't even try to do the research. That takes time to do. That's your weak argument. You don't have stats on anything. You're just throwing random comments out there to suit your agenda. You sound like a butthurt Canelo fan.

and yet, still the facts remain.....

FACT: it is obvious GGG/Munguia would be a horrible mismatch
FACT: that fight was refused for safety reasons
FACT: Golovkin intentionally selected an opponent that he KNEW was not on his level, so that he would have an advantage

[Raggamuffin]

and yet, still the facts remain.....

FACT: it is obvious GGG/Munguia would be a horrible mismatch
FACT: that fight was refused for safety reasons
FACT: Golovkin intentionally selected an opponent that he KNEW was not on his level, so that he would have an advantage

Okay......