Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Quickly Rules Out The Idea of a Joshua vs. Parker Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by redmish View Post
    Learn to spell before you talk crap. It's paid off.
    Nobody gives two sh%ts this forum isn't a Charles ****en's novel. Rigged fight the smaller man wasn't allowed on the inside so game over. Hearn protecting AJ and depriving all of what should have been the real fight.
    Last edited by Karoriori; 04-01-2018, 06:14 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by yammy25 View Post
      you mean the ref that david higgins negotiated be installed?
      the non-british ref trhat higgins said he was happy to have negotiated for and is on record as saying it meant that there was to be no bias?

      riiiiiiiiiight
      Higgins signed off before he was slipped an envelope. I'm sure you think he did a stellar job protecting AJ all night

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
        The inside game favors the smaller guy with shorter arms. Yeah he stopped them both but that favored Jacob's more. Damn not hard to figure out if you know anything about boxing. Dont just take my word ask someone else about it.
        100% Correct. The guy with a 6 inch shorter reach was considerably more disadvantaged it's not rocket science.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Karoriori View Post
          100% Correct. The guy with a 6 inch shorter reach was considerably more disadvantaged it's not rocket science.
          EXACTLY!!! I bet Kovalov WISHES the Ref. did that SHT for him against Ward???

          Comment


          • #35
            Even though the scorecards were rubbish, I still thought Joshua won fairly clearly, and it wasn't an appealing fight. Parker made Joshua look sluggish and inaccurate, but he didn't have the reach to accomplish enough himself, leading to a fight characterised by a lot of non-action. Therefore it's not a fight I'm really interested in seeing again, although I do think Parker could still do quite well against a lot of other guys.

            Comment


            • #36
              Great! Who the hell would want to see that again?

              Comment


              • #37
                Who was thinking/wanting that??? Besides Parker and his team I imagine.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                  ??? Your dumb! Yeah the guy with short arms was helped by not letting him go inside??? GTFO!!! Damn dumbest sht I've heard. Next your gonna tell me Parker tying one arm behind his back benefits him also???
                  Parker was saved from a career ending uppercut. I was not happy with the ref.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Karoriori View Post
                    100% Correct. The guy with a 6 inch shorter reach was considerably more disadvantaged it's not rocket science.
                    How is he disadvantaged? All he needs to do is push Parker backward and land a career ending uppercut.
                    Is that too difficult for you to understand?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      That'll be doing us all a favour. That was an eyesore.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP