How come posters on here do a u turn when it comes to Joshua and wilder

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Madison Boxing
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35364
    • 6,455
    • 3,367
    • 190,590

    #1

    How come posters on here do a u turn when it comes to Joshua and wilder

    I'm sure a lot of these 'wilder fans' are fans of defensive fighters who get the job done. I'm pretty sure some of them are the same posters who turn their nose up at 'crude power punches'. But when Joshua shows good iq and defensive nous it means he was vulnerable and exposed lol. But wilder gets outboxed and badly hurt but 'he's the man!!!!'. I didn't hear you lot crying when ward stunk the joint out in his fights, or when mayweather refused to engage in most of his fights. But when Joshua wins 118-110 and 119-109, that damn euro bum got exposed. Bitter lot you are and btw if you are such hardcore wilder fans I suggest you buy tickets for the kownacki fight, they'll be easy to get a hold of lol.
  • sunny31
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 5780
    • 450
    • 35
    • 128,703

    #2
    Originally posted by DramaShow
    I'm sure a lot of these 'wilder fans' are fans of defensive fighters who get the job done. I'm pretty sure some of them are the same posters who turn their nose up at 'crude power punches'. But when Joshua shows good iq and defensive nous it means he was vulnerable and exposed lol. But wilder gets outboxed and badly hurt but 'he's the man!!!!'. I didn't hear you lot crying when ward stunk the joint out in his fights, or when mayweather refused to engage in most of his fights. But when Joshua wins 118-110 and 119-109, that damn euro bum got exposed. Bitter lot you are and btw if you are such hardcore wilder fans I suggest you buy tickets for the kownacki fight, they'll be easy to get a hold of lol.
    I don't agree with most of what you say but on this occasion I do. The only criticism of Joshua's performance is that he wasn't able to get off attacking wise all that often, but he was still pretty accurate and Parker fought a good defensive fight, they both did, you should be giving them credit, the style of this fight in no way determines the outcome of other fights in this division.

    As I mentioned in my thread yesterday, most people here would always rather criticise fighters, than give the opposing fighter credit. Lazy fanboyism.

    Comment

    • Sparked_26
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2012
      • 15737
      • 1,069
      • 140
      • 93,128

      #3
      Parker escaped any credit in the main too.

      He's a good, smart boxer, who boxed well albeit could not overcome Joshua's physical advantages.

      I just think if you don't enjoy a fighters style or a fighter - it is embarrassing to just not like a fighter (like being a teenage girl who dislikes a popstars girlfriend ffs) - but don't watch them.

      I didn't watch Hopkins for years. I knew he was a top fighter but I knew I basically didn't enjoy watching him fight. I knew staying up until 5 a.m to watch him fight would leave me cold. He's a legend of the sport. I just couldn't watch him in the main. Then you get in the realms of being a hater. I find it hard to be objective when it comes to Hopkins because I DID want him to lose.

      Comment

      • juggernaut666
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2015
        • 15544
        • 1,226
        • 500
        • 87,472

        #4
        Wilder has been behind in 3 title fights , Spzilka , Washington , Ortiz . Hes lost 15 rounds just in those fights . Im sure they wouldn't want to compare actual performances . Joshua has never been behind in any fight .

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP