Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo PED Saga, Joshua-Parker, Golovkin

[BigStomps]

Ahem;



Ain't a lot to love by the sounds of it, Lil'Stomps

Bring your momma over punk and I'll show the biitch how much there is to love!

[BigStomps]

You know who goes around calling guys tiny dic??? Pissed-off chicks that just got dumped...

Lol, that's right! That fool is my own personal biitch now!

[BigStomps]

LOL! I'll go out on a limb here and guess you're a Canelo fan and Bread touched a nerve...

If you actually pay attention to what Bread says, you'll know he has connections from the inside game in boxing, and it seems there's a long list of fighters who are on the "unproven, but extremely likely to be using PEDs" list and Canelo was one of them.

He never mentions it if the fighters test clean, but pay attention to the ones he openly praises for being clean. It has nothing to do with being gangster or tough, Bread is just responsible because he's a true professional.

Fucc all that! He's an overrated trainer who don't got the balls to call it as he sees it!
If he feels a fighter is juicing then why not say it now before it actually happens??
Don't accuse anyone, just come out with a list of fighters he SUSPECTS are taking PED's. He can't get sued for that according to him.
But don't speak up after the fact.
That makes him look like a straight biitch!

[BigStomps]

"A responsible media person or boxing figure can’t without the possibly of being sued….." Well, Mister Breadman, if you're a journalist and you can't put out the info you have, you're just another miserable keyboard warrior... the same king you're denigrating.

Exactly my point!
Fucc Breadman! Don't speak up after the fact!
Say it now! Come out with a list of fighters he SUSPECTS are using PED's!

[BigStomps]

Jesus Christo man, do you ever stop talking about ****s and f@gs?

Does that turn you on?? You wanna be my little biitch too?
You little punk F A G G!
I'll have selling pu-ssy on the streets!

[Sledgeweather17]

Bread you talk about perfect performances and you don't mention Mayweather vs Corralles? Thee most perfect performance ever? Come on man.

GGG may or may have not been ducked by those middleweights, but again I sense hypocricy. I won't mention GGG ducking a Jacobs rematch because I think Jacobs himself is ducking the rematch. Jacobs never showed any enthusiasm about a rematch. He didn't call GGG out from the top of the mountain and he when they asked him immediately after the fight about it his response was not convincing at all. For someone many believed was robbed and he himself believes so, Jacobs didn't seem all that interested at all.

However, GGG did duck Andre Ward. Don't give me that 'not in the same division' excuse, GGG said anyone from 154lbs to 168ls, Lara and Ward called his bluff, and GGG ducked and made high risk/low reward excuses, exactly the same excuse those middleweights you mentioned made.

Secondly, you crush Martinez for calling out smaller guys instead of fighting GGG, but wasn't GGG calling out calling out Floyd Mayweather, a welterweight, to fight him at middleweight? Didn't fight Brook, a welterweight champion, at middleweight? There goes this hypocrital bullshieet again.

You ask why all those guys got a shot a middleweight titles before GGG did? And you say that proves that GGG was being ducked. Yet Charlo is GGG's mandatory but GGG lobbied the wbc to order a Canelo rematch before Charlo, and instead of having Charlo as back up for the Canelo ped case, they trying to secure Saunders and not Charlo, the mandatory. Does this sound familiar? Isn't that the same concept you used to justify GGG being ducked? Do you think GGG will fight Charlo?

[Zaryu]

Fucc all that! He's an overrated trainer who don't got the balls to call it as he sees it!
If he feels a fighter is juicing then why not say it now before it actually happens??
Don't accuse anyone, just come out with a list of fighters he SUSPECTS are taking PED's. He can't get sued for that according to him.
But don't speak up after the fact.
That makes him look like a straight biitch!

That's a fair question that only he could truly answer, however, I'm assuming it has something to do with his professionalism and maintaining a good relationship with his contacts, and maybe even the fighters too. What if some of that information is wrong and he "condemns", with his su****ions, a fighter that was considering working with him?

I'm just saying Bread seems like a good guy, and he adds value to this website with his insight. He's not someone we should disregard because he suspected Canelo of PEDs and didn't say anything until he failed a test.

[BattlingNelson]

"A responsible media person or boxing figure can’t without the possibly of being sued….." Well, Mister Breadman, if you're a journalist and you can't put out the info you have, you're just another miserable keyboard warrior... the same king you're denigrating.

It Was su****ion. No evidence. You cannot go out in public and declare someone an abuser without the risk of being sued for defamation. If you don’t have evidence as a journalist or public figure, you have to stfu. It’s not like an anonymous message board. Noob.

[Shadoww702]

Bread you talk about perfect performances and you don't mention Mayweather vs Corralles? Thee most perfect performance ever? Come on man.

GGG may or may have not been ducked by those middleweights, but again I sense hypocricy. I won't mention GGG ducking a Jacobs rematch because I think Jacobs himself is ducking the rematch. Jacobs never showed any enthusiasm about a rematch. He didn't call GGG out from the top of the mountain and he when they asked him immediately after the fight about it his response was not convincing at all. For someone many believed was robbed and he himself believes so, Jacobs didn't seem all that interested at all.

However, GGG did duck Andre Ward. Don't give me that 'not in the same division' excuse, GGG said anyone from 154lbs to 168ls, Lara and Ward called his bluff, and GGG ducked and made high risk/low reward excuses, exactly the same excuse those middleweights you mentioned made.

Secondly, you crush Martinez for calling out smaller guys instead of fighting GGG, but wasn't GGG calling out calling out Floyd Mayweather, a welterweight, to fight him at middleweight? Didn't fight Brook, a welterweight champion, at middleweight? There goes this hypocrital bullshieet again.

You ask why all those guys got a shot a middleweight titles before GGG did? And you say that proves that GGG was being ducked. Yet Charlo is GGG's mandatory but GGG lobbied the wbc to order a Canelo rematch before Charlo, and instead of having Charlo as back up for the Canelo ped case, they trying to secure Saunders and not Charlo, the mandatory. Does this sound familiar? Isn't that the same concept you used to justify GGG being ducked? Do you think GGG will fight Charlo?

Good post! Makes sense. I agree he clearly ducked Ward and he was the one who opened his mouth and couldn't stay in his lane.

[AKAcronym]

Bread you talk about perfect performances and you don't mention Mayweather vs Corralles? Thee most perfect performance ever? Come on man.

GGG may or may have not been ducked by those middleweights, but again I sense hypocricy. I won't mention GGG ducking a Jacobs rematch because I think Jacobs himself is ducking the rematch. Jacobs never showed any enthusiasm about a rematch. He didn't call GGG out from the top of the mountain and he when they asked him immediately after the fight about it his response was not convincing at all. For someone many believed was robbed and he himself believes so, Jacobs didn't seem all that interested at all.

However, GGG did duck Andre Ward. Don't give me that 'not in the same division' excuse, GGG said anyone from 154lbs to 168ls, Lara and Ward called his bluff, and GGG ducked and made high risk/low reward excuses, exactly the same excuse those middleweights you mentioned made.

Secondly, you crush Martinez for calling out smaller guys instead of fighting GGG, but wasn't GGG calling out calling out Floyd Mayweather, a welterweight, to fight him at middleweight? Didn't fight Brook, a welterweight champion, at middleweight? There goes this hypocrital bullshieet again.

You ask why all those guys got a shot a middleweight titles before GGG did? And you say that proves that GGG was being ducked. Yet Charlo is GGG's mandatory but GGG lobbied the wbc to order a Canelo rematch before Charlo, and instead of having Charlo as back up for the Canelo ped case, they trying to secure Saunders and not Charlo, the mandatory. Does this sound familiar? Isn't that the same concept you used to justify GGG being ducked? Do you think GGG will fight Charlo?

The Ward scenario is one of the most tiring arguments I've seen so I'm not going to touch that, but no one honestly believes Golovkin ducked Lara. Disregard whatever Abel has said, it was still K2 who reached out to Lara's team, and despite Lara's "call outs," when asked if he would go to 160, repeatedly said 154. And you do know anyone would go for a unification over a mandatory right?