Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo PED Saga, Joshua-Parker, Golovkin

[Donjovi]

Can't figure out how to post a pic of his email from Nov 2014 where bread says he's always suspected canelo and his brother. Not sure why bread is getting trolled, he gives unbiased and objective insight.

[BattlingNelson]

Objectivity. He's been pushing his opinion the last 2-3 mailbags.

He didn't have anywhere near as much to say about PEDvektin during the Wilder saga.

Dude is white trash and Trump Nationalist.

Doesn't make a huge diff but let's call a spade a spade.

WALL JUST GOT TEN FEET HIGHER.

So what was wrong and what should he have said?

You are aware that it’s a mailbag where you ask someone for an opinion. Opinions are subjective but, in most cases, based on facts and observations. (Not on nsb obviously).

[TonyGe]

Can't figure out how to post a pic of his email from Nov 2014 where bread says he's always suspected canelo and his brother. Not sure why bread is getting trolled, he gives unbiased and objective insight.

If Canelo has to use PEDs to fight Golovkin and there is strict testing in place there is a very real possibility there will be no rematch.

[BigStomps]

Damn bro stop replying to me, I already deleted those nudes you sent me as well, I wasn't even talking TO YOU, I was talking about you (and your lil' stomper)

Shut the fucc up you piece of shet!

[steeve steel]

It Was su****ion. No evidence. You cannot go out in public and declare someone an abuser without the risk of being sued for defamation. If you don’t have evidence as a journalist or public figure, you have to stfu. It’s not like an anonymous message board. Noob.

And what about now? Is it the right time now? lol

['b']

Shut the fucc up you piece of shet!

No you.

Full stop no returns lalalalalalala

[BattlingNelson]

And what about now? Is it the right time now? lol

Edwards clearly feels that Clenelo making 2 positive tests is enough to voice his su****ion.

[Bjl12]

So what was wrong and what should he have said?

You are aware that it’s a mailbag where you ask someone for an opinion. Opinions are subjective but, in most cases, based on facts and observations. (Not on nsb obviously).

In the last 2-3 mailbags scumbag white supremacist WHITEBreadMan keeps talking about his "speculation" regarding PED usage.

He pretends to be unbiased, but has been very outspoken about he "knew all along Canelo was a drug cheat". The dude is just a hater.

If you suspect them all along than say it. Why doesn't he? Because he's afraid he'll look like an idiot and be wrong.

If dude as objective he'd take his horrible, white nationalist opinion out of what's happened and say something like:

"it looks bad and Canelo is definitely guilty of having PED's in his system. The only point of "controversy" is whether he knowingly ingested or used the PED's."

WhiteBreadMan can give his opinion on whether he thinks the fight should go on...but raining down on Canelo is a bigger show of support for Donald Trump than it is for Boxing Information since he adds nothing but an "I told you so" to the conversation.

With that being said..he still hasn't even gone to NSAC trial yet. There may be information introduced we don't already have. WHITEBREADMan is slaying the cheating, illegal Latino before he even has his trial.

Just say it WHITEBreadMan...you won't MexiCAN'Ts OUT.

SAY IT.

[Bjl12]

Edwards clearly feels that Clenelo making 2 positive tests is enough to voice his su****ion.

It is odd that the WADA director announced Ca$hnelo's drug tests are "consistent with meat contamination":

As Daniel Eichner, director of [the Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory], the WADA-accredited lab that conducted the tests stated in his letter [Monday], 'These values are all within the range of what is expected from meat contamination.' So the WADA director of the lab that does these tests is lying?

[steeve steel]

Edwards clearly feels that Clenelo making 2 positive tests is enough to voice his su****ion.

Did he start voicing his su****ion before OR AFTER people got on his case for not voicing his su****ion?