AJ vs Parker in UHD
Collapse
-
Here in the USA its free. I wouldnt pay sheet to watch this coward in Ultra high definition face another bum.Comment
-
Too be fair only time I've noticed a difference is with ps4 games on a 4k set up more detail in landscapes etcOriginally posted by StudentOfDaGameCan you tell the difference?. It's just crispy HD to me without the pixels. Same pictures as the Everton vs Man City game
. I can't really tell the difference to much LOL.Comment
-
I've been gaming in 4k UHD on an LD OLED and the difference is real. It's not like you are missing out on a ton, but if your TV can replicate UHD nicely, you get an extra bit of "wow". More realism. Day scenes feel like they are in actual sunlight and night scenes play more like the human eye sees them, with lights and shadows not falling into obscurity.Originally posted by StudentOfDaGameCan you tell the difference?. It's just crispy HD to me without the pixels. Same pictures as the Everton vs Man City game
. I can't really tell the difference to much LOL.Comment
-
I'm not a massive gamer anymore but seeing mgsv in 4k convinced me it's worth an upgrade if you're already paying loads for the console, games etc and thanks bro you tooOriginally posted by StudentOfDaGameI need to try it out I play WW2 but just straight HDMI cable. I don't know what's what anymore. Enjoy the fight!.Comment
-
Too bad I bought it on my desktop, should watch it through my PS4 Pro to get 4k but can't be bothered now, probably not even possible.
Anyway, 60fps would be much better than 4k. 4k is nice, for sure though. But better with sports like football or tennis, where fine detail is more important. TBH, 4k for boxing over 1080p isn't really such a big deal, imo. They really need to go 60fps though, that is so big.Comment
Comment